Skip to main content
Calcimator

Stability GZ Curve Calculator

Calculate the righting arm (GZ) curve from hull geometry and loading to assess vessel stability.

About this calculator

This calculator estimates a vessel's transverse stability using standard naval architecture relationships. The metacentric height, GM = KM - KG, is the classic initial-stability figure: KM (height of the metacenter above the keel) is estimated as KB (height of the center of buoyancy, approximated here as 0.53 times draft -- a commonly used rule-of-thumb for typical hull forms, not a precise Morrish-formula result) plus BM (the metacentric radius, beam-squared divided by 12 times draft, which is the exact box-shaped-waterplane approximation of BM = transverse moment of inertia of the waterplane / displaced volume). A positive GM means the vessel tends to right itself from a small heel; a zero or negative GM means it doesn't, which is the most basic stability check in naval architecture. Beyond small angles, this calculator uses the standard "wall-sided" righting-arm formula, GZ = sin(theta) x [GM + 0.5 x BM x tan^2(theta)], a real textbook approximation valid only for hull forms that stay roughly wall-sided (vertical-sided) through the heel angle in question -- an assumption that ends once the deck edge immerses or the bilge emerges.

Published guidance puts that around 20-30 degrees for typical hull forms, and as low as roughly 10 degrees for full-form hulls like bulk carriers and tankers; this calculator has no freeboard or hull-fullness input to tell those cases apart, so it uses a single conservative 30 degree cap and does not compute, chart, or search past it. The maximum GZ and vanishing angle it reports are honestly bounded to that calculable range: if the curve is still rising or still positive when the cap is reached, the corresponding output says so in words (e.g. "beyond calculable range") instead of guessing a specific higher angle. Regulatory stability criteria like the IMO Intact Stability Code evaluate GZ-curve shape (maximum GZ, angle of maximum GZ, area under the curve, and range of positive stability) against published minimums for different vessel types -- this calculator produces the same kind of GZ curve those criteria are evaluated against, but does not check compliance with any specific regulatory threshold, since those vary by vessel type and flag-state requirements, and it cannot evaluate curve shape past its own 30 degree cap.

Inputs

ft
ft
LT
ft
ft

Results

Metacentric Height (GM)

1.55 ft

≈ 5 credit cards

Maximum GZ

0.98 ft

≈ 3 credit cards

Angle of Max GZ≥30° (still rising at the edge of the formula's valid range; true peak beyond calculable range)
Vanishing Angleexceeds 30° (beyond the formula's calculable range)
KB (Center of Buoyancy)2.65 ft
BM (Metacentric Radius)2.4 ft
Max Righting Moment14.63 ft·LT
How to Use This Calculator
  1. Enter the hull beam and draft in feet, displacement in long tons, and KG (height of center of gravity).
  2. Optionally override GM if you have a measured metacentric height value.
  3. Review the metacentric height (GM) — positive GM indicates initial stability.
  4. Check maximum GZ (righting arm in feet); the angle it occurs at may read "beyond calculable range" if the curve is still rising when the formula's 30° validity cap is reached.
  5. Check the vanishing angle: a specific angle below 30° flags an early loss of positive stability, while "exceeds 30° (beyond calculable range)" means the vessel stays stable throughout this formula's valid range -- comparing against a specific regulatory minimum (these vary by vessel type, e.g. under the IMO Intact Stability Code) requires a full hydrostatic stability assessment beyond this calculator.

How the result changes with Beam

BeamMetacentric Height (GM)Maximum GZ
6-0.25 ft0 ft
90.5 ft0.36 ft
184.55 ft2.73 ft
3014.15 ft8.33 ft

What each input means

Beam
Maximum beam of the vessel.
Draft
Draft at the current loading condition.
Displacement
Vessel displacement in long tons at current loading.
KG (Height of COG)
Vertical center of gravity measured from the keel. Lower values improve stability.
GM Override (optional)
If you know the exact GM, enter it here to override the calculated value. Leave at 0 to use the estimate.

How this is calculated

Worked example, using the default values

  1. Identify Input Parameters
    5 parameters
    Beam = 12, Draft = 5, Displacement = 15, KG (Height of COG) = 3.5, GM Override = 0 = 5 input(s) provided
  2. Calculate Metacentric Height
    1.55 = 1.55
  3. Calculate Maximum GZ
    Maximum GZ
    0.975 = 0.975
  4. Calculate Angle of Max GZ
    Angle of Max GZ
    ≥30° (still rising at the edge of the formula's valid range; true peak beyond calculable range) = ≥30° (still rising at the edge of the formula's valid range; true peak beyond calculable range)
  5. Calculate Vanishing Angle
    exceeds 30° (beyond the formula's calculable range) = exceeds 30° (beyond the formula's calculable range)

Engine last updated . Checked against 3 independently-derived tests — how we verify calculators. Built by Paul Gunder, a software engineer, not a licensed financial, medical, or legal professional.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does a positive metacentric height (GM) actually mean?

GM measures initial transverse stability -- the height of the metacenter above the vessel's center of gravity. A positive GM means that when the vessel heels slightly, the shifting center of buoyancy creates a righting moment that pushes it back upright; a zero or negative GM means the vessel is neutrally or unstably balanced at small heel angles and may not return upright on its own. It's the single most basic stability check in naval architecture, though it only describes behavior near zero heel, not the full range captured by the GZ curve.

Why does this calculator only trust its GZ formula up to 30 degrees of heel?

The wall-sided righting-arm formula (GZ = sin(theta) x [GM + 0.5 x BM x tan^2(theta)]) assumes the hull's underwater and topside shape stays roughly vertical-sided through the heel angle -- an assumption that ends once the deck edge immerses or the bilge emerges. Published naval-architecture guidance puts that breakdown point around 20-30 degrees of heel for typical hull forms, and as low as roughly 10 degrees for full-form hulls like bulk carriers and tankers. Since this calculator has no freeboard or hull-fullness input to distinguish those cases, it uses a single 30 degree cap -- a reasonable upper bound for moderate hull forms, but potentially still optimistic for a very full hull -- and does not compute, chart, or search for a peak past it, to avoid reporting a physically meaningless value from the formula's tan^2 term growing unbounded at higher angles.

What does "beyond calculable range" mean for angle of max GZ or vanishing angle?

It means the GZ curve was still rising, or still positive, when this calculator's 30 degree formula-validity cap was reached, so the true angle of maximum GZ or the true vanishing angle lies somewhere past 30 degrees -- a real value this calculator cannot determine without full hydrostatic data for the actual hull. That's a distinct, honest result from a specific numeric angle within the 0-30 degree range: it tells you the vessel is not showing a stability problem within the range this formula can compute, without pretending to know exactly how far the good behavior extends.

Why is the estimated center of buoyancy (KB) just a fraction of draft?

KB = 0.53 x draft is a commonly used rule-of-thumb approximation for typical hull forms, not a precise calculation from the vessel's actual underwater volume distribution -- the real value depends on hull shape (block coefficient and section shape) and is normally taken from a vessel's hydrostatic tables or computed via integration (e.g., the Morrish formula) for an actual design. Treat this calculator's KB, and the GM and GZ values that depend on it, as an estimate for a typical hull form rather than a substitute for a vessel-specific hydrostatic calculation.

Does a good-looking GZ curve here mean my vessel meets stability regulations?

Not by itself -- this calculator computes the same kind of GZ curve that regulatory frameworks like the IMO Intact Stability Code evaluate, but it doesn't check your results against any specific regulatory threshold, since required minimums for maximum GZ, angle of maximum GZ, area under the curve, and range of positive stability vary by vessel type, size, and flag-state requirements. A formal stability assessment requires comparing actual hydrostatic data against the applicable regulation for your specific vessel.

The questions that sit next to this one — chosen by subject, including calculators filed under a different category.

More in Aviation, Marine & Transport.