Skip to main content
Calcimator

Mark-Recapture Population Estimator

Estimate wild population size using the Lincoln-Petersen mark-recapture method with Chapman correction and confidence intervals.

About this calculator

Population Estimate (N) uses the classic Lincoln-Petersen formula, N = MC/R: Marked in First Capture times Total Second Capture, divided by Recaptured Marked. Because R is a count of marked individuals found again — a subset that can never exceed either M or C by definition — this calculator clamps R to the smaller of the three values before running any math, so an entered figure that doesn't respect that real-world constraint (say, more "recaptured" than were ever marked or ever caught the second time) can't produce a nonsensical or undefined result. All three inputs move Population Estimate in a predictable direction: raising M or C raises it, while raising R lowers it, since a higher recapture proportion implies a smaller total population relative to your sample sizes.

Recapture Rate (R divided by C) and Marking Fraction (M divided by Population Estimate) look like two different metrics but reduce to the exact same value algebraically — substituting N = MC/R into M/N gives R/C, so they will always match. The Chapman Estimate applies the bias correction statistician Douglas Chapman published in 1951 (N_c = ((M+1)(C+1)/(R+1)) - 1), derived from properties of the hypergeometric distribution specifically to reduce the small-sample bias the plain Lincoln-Petersen formula carries when R is low, and the 95% confidence interval uses the classical Lincoln-Petersen variance approximation, which is known to widen quickly and become unstable when R is small — the Sampling Adequacy label exists specifically to flag when R is too low (below roughly 7) for the estimate to be trusted at face value, a well-documented limitation of the method rather than a quirk of this calculator.

Inputs

Results

Population Estimate (N)

300

Chapman Estimate282
95% CI Lower130
95% CI Upper470
Standard Error87
Recapture Rate16.7%
Sampling AdequacyAdequate
Marking Fraction16.67%

Figures current as of 1951. Source: Chapman, D.G. Some properties of the hypergeometric distribution with applications to zoological sample censuses. University of California Publications in Statistics, 1951;1(7):131-160.

How to Use This Calculator
  1. Enter Marked in First Capture (M) — the number of animals marked and released.
  2. Record Total Second Capture (C) — all animals caught in the second sample.
  3. Count Recaptured Marked (R) — marked individuals in the second sample.
  4. Review Population Estimate (N) using the Lincoln-Petersen method and the Chapman corrected estimate.
  5. Check 95% CI Lower and Upper bounds — narrow the interval by increasing sample size (larger C).

How the result changes with Marked in First Capture (M)

Marked in First Capture (M)Population Estimate (N)
25150
38228
75450
125750

What each input means

Marked in First Capture (M)
Number of individuals captured, marked, and released in the first sampling event.
Total Second Capture (C)
Total number of individuals captured in the second sampling event (both marked and unmarked).
Recaptured Marked (R)
Number of previously marked individuals found in the second capture. Must be ≤ both M and C.

What each result means

Population Estimate (N)
Lincoln-Petersen estimate: N = MC/R.
Chapman Estimate
Bias-corrected estimate for small samples.

How this is calculated

Worked example, using the default values

  1. Identify Input Parameters
    Marked in First Capture (M) = 50, Total Second Capture (C) = 60, Recaptured Marked (R) = 10 = 3 input(s) provided
  2. Calculate Population Estimate
    Population Estimate
    300 = 300
  3. Calculate Chapman Estimate
    Chapman Estimate
    282 = 282
  4. Calculate 95% CI Lower
    95% CI Lower
    130 = 130

Figures and sources

Engine last updated . Checked against 2 independently-derived tests — how we verify calculators. Built by Paul Gunder, a software engineer, not a licensed financial, medical, or legal professional.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happens if I enter a Recaptured Marked (R) value larger than my Marked in First Capture (M)?

The calculator caps R at whichever is smaller between M and the Total Second Capture (C), since a recaptured marked animal is logically a subset of both — you can't recapture more marked individuals than you originally marked, or more than you caught in the second sample. This prevents the underlying variance formula from producing a nonsensical negative or undefined result.

Why do Recapture Rate and Marking Fraction always show the same number?

They're computed from different starting points — Recapture Rate is R divided by C, while Marking Fraction is M divided by the Population Estimate — but algebraically they reduce to the identical formula once you substitute in the Lincoln-Petersen population formula. It's a genuine mathematical coincidence built into the method, not a display bug.

Does raising my second capture sample size always improve the estimate?

It moves Population Estimate upward for a fixed R, but a larger C without a correspondingly larger R actually lowers Recapture Rate, which is one of the signals used to judge Sampling Adequacy. A useful mark-recapture study generally needs enough recaptures (R), not just a large second sample, to keep the confidence interval tight.

Why does Sampling Adequacy flag some estimates as 'Poor' or 'Inadequate'?

The classical Lincoln-Petersen variance formula is known to become unreliable when the number of recaptured marked individuals (R) is small — typically fewer than about 7. With few recaptures, the confidence interval can widen dramatically or the estimate can swing heavily with a single additional recapture, so the label is a documented caution about the statistical method itself, not just this calculator's arithmetic.

The questions that sit next to this one — chosen by subject, including calculators filed under a different category.

More in Environment, Weather & Climate.