Skip to main content
Calcimator

Coagulant Dosing Calculator

Calculate alum, ferric chloride, or PACl feed rates from jar test results. Estimate alkalinity consumption and sludge production.

About this calculator

This calculator translates a jar-test result into full-scale chemical feed numbers for one of four coagulants — alum, ferric chloride, ferric sulfate, or PACl — each carrying its own typical liquid concentration, specific gravity, unit cost, and alkalinity demand. The core conversion is the standard water-treatment identity lbs/day = flow (MGD) × dose (mg/L) × 8.34, which gives the dry-chemical feed rate; dividing that by the coagulant's concentration and specific gravity converts it to a liquid feed rate in gallons per day for pump sizing. Alkalinity consumption is calculated from the dose and a coagulant-specific consumption factor (ferric salts consume roughly twice as much alkalinity per mg/L as alum), and the pH-drop figure derived from it is explicitly a rough approximation, not a full acid-base equilibrium calculation — treat it as a flag for when you need actual alkalinity/pH monitoring, not a substitute for it. Sludge production combines a coagulant-specific solids yield factor with a small turbidity-derived solids estimate.

Costs assume a flat polymer price of $2.50/lb regardless of polymer type. Rapid-mix and flocculation basin volumes are sized from fixed detention-time assumptions (30 seconds and 25 minutes respectively) rather than from your actual basin geometry or G-value target, so use them as a starting point for basin sizing, not a final hydraulic design. As with any coagulation model, real optimal dose still has to come from your own jar testing — this tool only scales that result to plant flow.

Inputs

MGD
NTU
mg/L
mg/L

Results

Coagulant Feed Rate

1,251 lbs/day

Liquid Feed Rate

235 gpd

CoagulantAluminum Sulfate (Alum)
Polymer Feed Rate8.34 lbs/day
Alkalinity Consumed13.2 mg/L as CaCO₃
Sludge Production551 lbs/day
Annual Chemical Cost$62,404.00
Cost per Million Gallons$34.19
30-Day Storage (liquid)7,049 gallons
Rapid Mix Volume1,736 gallons
Flocculation Volume86,806 gallons
P H Drop0.26
Thirty Day Supply (lbs)37,530
How to Use This Calculator
  1. Enter Plant Flow Rate (MGD) and Raw Water Turbidity (NTU) from your source water monitoring.
  2. Select Coagulant Type (alum, ferric chloride, PACl) based on your chemical supply agreement.
  3. Enter Optimal Dose (mg/L) from jar test results — adjust seasonally as source water quality changes.
  4. Add Polymer Dose (mg/L) if your plant uses a coagulant aid or filter aid polymer.
  5. Review Coagulant Feed Rate (lbs/day) and Liquid Feed Rate (gpd) to set pump outputs and verify chemical tank sizing.
  6. Check Alkali Consumption to determine if pH adjustment is needed to maintain coagulation efficiency.

How the result changes with Plant Flow Rate

Plant Flow RateCoagulant Feed RateLiquid Feed Rate
2.5625.5 lbs/day117.5 gpd
3.75938.3 lbs/day176.2 gpd
7.51,876.5 lbs/day352.4 gpd
133,252.6 lbs/day610.9 gpd

What each input means

Plant Flow Rate
Treatment plant design flow rate.
Raw Water Turbidity
Source water turbidity in Nephelometric Turbidity Units.
Coagulant Type
1 = Alum, 2 = Ferric Chloride, 3 = Ferric Sulfate, 4 = PACl.
Optimal Dose (from Jar Test)
Optimal coagulant dose determined from jar testing. Typical alum: 10-60 mg/L.
Polymer Dose
Flocculant polymer dose. Typical: 0.1-1.0 mg/L. 0 if not used.

How this is calculated

Worked example, using the default values

  1. Identify Input Parameters
    4 parameters
    Plant Flow Rate = 5, Raw Water Turbidity = 15, Coagulant Type = 1, Optimal Dose (from Jar Test) = 30 = 5 input(s) provided
  2. Calculate Coagulant Feed Rate
    Coagulant Feed Rate
    1251 = 1251
  3. Calculate Liquid Feed Rate
    Liquid Feed Rate
    235 = 235
  4. Calculate Coagulant
    Coagulant = coag.name
    Aluminum Sulfate (Alum) = Aluminum Sulfate (Alum)
  5. Calculate Polymer Feed Rate
    Polymer Feed Rate
    8.34 = 8.34

Engine last updated . Checked against 2 independently-derived tests — how we verify calculators. Built by Paul Gunder, a software engineer, not a licensed financial, medical, or legal professional.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why does ferric chloride consume more alkalinity than alum at the same dose?

The calculator applies a coagulant-specific alkalinity consumption factor — 0.92 mg/L alkalinity per mg/L of ferric chloride versus 0.44 for alum — reflecting the real chemistry difference between ferric and aluminum salts reacting with water's natural bicarbonate buffering. At the same mg/L dose, ferric chloride will therefore show roughly double the alkalinity draw and a correspondingly larger estimated pH drop.

Why is the liquid feed rate different from the coagulant feed rate in lbs/day?

Coagulant Feed Rate (lbs/day) is the dry-chemical-equivalent dose from the standard flow × dose × 8.34 formula. Liquid Feed Rate divides that by the coagulant's specific concentration and specific gravity, since coagulants are delivered as liquid solutions of varying strength — for example, PACl's low 10% concentration means its liquid feed rate in gallons/day is much higher than alum's 48% solution for the same dry-chemical dose.

How accurate is the pH drop estimate?

It's explicitly a rough approximation — alkalinity consumption divided by 50 — not a real acid-base equilibrium calculation. It's meant as a flag that a meaningful alkalinity or pH shift is likely, prompting you to verify with actual jar-test or online monitoring data rather than relying on this number for dosing decisions.

Why does the polymer cost use a flat $2.50/lb regardless of coagulant type?

The calculator treats polymer as a separate flocculant aid priced independently from whichever primary coagulant (alum, ferric chloride, ferric sulfate, or PACl) you select, since polymer type and pricing don't correlate with the coagulant choice. If your actual polymer contract differs from $2.50/lb, the reported daily and annual polymer costs will be proportionally off even though the feed-rate calculation itself is unaffected.

Why do rapid mix and flocculation volumes not change when I adjust the dose or turbidity?

Those two volumes are sized purely from flow rate and fixed detention-time assumptions — 30 seconds for rapid mix and 25 minutes for flocculation — not from dose, turbidity, or coagulant type. They're meant as a starting point for basin sizing based on hydraulic residence time, not a dose-responsive result, so use them alongside your own G-value and basin geometry checks.

The questions that sit next to this one — chosen by subject, including calculators filed under a different category.

More in Environment, Weather & Climate.