Skip to main content
Calcimator

Dam Spillway Design

Calculate spillway discharge capacity using the weir equation. Determine flow rate, approach velocity, and energy dissipation for dam spillway design.

About this calculator

A dam spillway's discharge capacity — how much water it can pass per second at a given water level — is governed by the standard weir equation, Q = Cd x L x H^1.5, the same relationship used in USBR and USACE hydraulic references for a preliminary estimate of free (unsubmerged) flow over a spillway crest. L is the effective crest length, the horizontal distance water actually flows over; H is the head, the depth of water above the crest, excluding the velocity of the approaching flow; and Cd is a discharge coefficient that captures how efficiently a specific crest shape converts head into flow — a broad, flat crest around 1.7 in this calculator's SI convention, a sharp-crested weir around 1.84, and a smoothly curved ogee crest, the shape used on most large concrete spillways, around 2.2, since its profile is engineered to match the underside of the falling water sheet and minimize energy loss. Because discharge scales with head raised to the 1.5 power rather than linearly, a modest rise in reservoir level well above the crest produces a disproportionately large jump in discharge capacity — a central fact in dam safety analysis, since it means a spillway rated for a moderate flood can pass a much larger flood with only a limited additional rise in head.

Alongside discharge in m³/s, cfs and ML/day, the calculator reports the mean velocity at the crest control section, where flow passes through critical depth (two-thirds of the head over the crest, so the flow area is L x 2H/3 rather than L x H — this is the crest velocity, not the approach velocity in the reservoir, which would need the crest height above the approach-channel invert), and the energy the stilling basin has to dissipate, computed from the crest-to-tailwater drop you enter rather than from the head standing on the crest. What it does not do: real spillway design also verifies submerged (tailwater-affected) flow conditions, models the actual as-built crest profile rather than assuming the idealized coefficient for its category, and checks discharge against the site's design flood — typically the probable maximum flood or a specified return-period event — none of which substitute for full USBR/USACE spillway design and independent dam-safety review on an actual structure.

Inputs

m
m

1.44–1.70 broad-crested · ~1.84 sharp-crested · 2.1–2.25 ogee

m

Results

Spillway Discharge

67.61 m³/s

Discharge (Imperial)

2,387.48 cfs

Daily Discharge5,841.15 ML/day
Velocity Over Crest3.38 m/s
Specific Discharge3.38 m³/s/m
Energy to Dissipate at the Toe19,896.4 kW

Figures current as of 1987. Source: U.S. Bureau of Reclamation. Design of Small Dams, 3rd ed. U.S. Department of the Interior, 1987.

How to Use This Calculator
  1. Enter Weir/Spillway Length, Head Over Crest, and the Discharge Coefficient (Cd) for your crest shape.
  2. Enter the Crest-to-Tailwater Drop — the vertical fall the stilling basin has to absorb.
  3. Review Spillway Discharge (m³/s) and Discharge (Imperial) (cfs), and Daily Discharge (ML/day) for reservoir-volume comparisons.
  4. Read Velocity Over Crest (m/s) as the mean velocity at the control section, and Energy to Dissipate at the Toe (kW) as the scale of energy the basin must handle.
  5. Use the rating curve to see how discharge grows with head, and the crest-shape chart to compare capacity across weir types at the same geometry.

How the result changes with Head Over Crest

Head Over CrestSpillway DischargeDischarge (Imperial)
0.7523.9 m³/s844.1 cfs
1.1344.2 m³/s1,561.07 cfs
2.25124.2 m³/s4,386.09 cfs
3.75267.24 m³/s9,437.35 cfs

What each input means

Weir/Spillway Length
Effective crest length of the spillway weir in meters
Head Over Crest
Water depth above the spillway crest (excluding velocity head)
Discharge Coefficient (Cd)
Weir coefficient for the actual crest shape, in SI units (Q in m³/s, L and H in m). Reference values: 1.7 broad-crested, 1.84 sharp-crested, 2.2 ogee crest. It is left continuous rather than a three-option picker because a real crest's coefficient varies within each of those families with head, crest width and upstream face slope.
Crest-to-Tailwater Drop
Vertical drop from the spillway crest down to the tailwater surface. This is the head that governs how much energy the stilling basin has to dissipate — not the head standing over the crest.

What each result means

Velocity Over Crest
Mean velocity at the control section, where flow passes through critical depth (2/3 of the head over the crest). This is not the approach velocity in the reservoir upstream.

How this is calculated

Formula

Q = Cd × L × H^(3/2)

Worked example, using the default values

  1. Identify Input Parameters
    4 parameters
    Weir/Spillway Length = 20 m, Head Over Crest = 1.5 m, Discharge Coefficient (Cd) = 1.84, Crest-to-Tailwater Drop = 30 m = 4 input(s) provided
  2. Spillway Discharge (weir equation)
    Q = Cd × L × H^1.5
    1.84 × 20 × 1.5^1.5 = 67.61 m³/s
  3. Convert to Imperial
    cfs = Q × 35.3147
    67.61 × 35.3147 = 2387.48 cfs
  4. Convert to Megalitres per Day
    ML/day = Q × 86400 ÷ 1000 (1 ML = 1,000 m³)
    67.61 × 86400 ÷ 1000 = 5841.15 ML/day
  5. Velocity Over Crest (at critical depth)
    V = Q / (L × (2/3)H)
    67.61 / (20 × 1) = 3.38 m/s
  6. Energy to Dissipate at the Toe
    P = ρ g Q H_drop ÷ 1000
    1000 × 9.81 × 67.61 × 30 ÷ 1000 = 19896.4 kW

Figures and sources

Engine last updated . Checked against 3 independently-derived tests — how we verify calculators. Built by Paul Gunder, a software engineer, not a licensed financial, medical, or legal professional.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why does discharge increase so much faster than head as the reservoir rises?

The weir equation raises head to the 1.5 power, so doubling the head over the crest doesn't double discharge — it multiplies discharge by about 2.83 (two to the 1.5 power). This nonlinear relationship is a core reason spillway design pays such close attention to freeboard and design flood levels: once water rises meaningfully above the crest, capacity grows quickly, but a spillway sized too low relative to its crest length can still be quickly overwhelmed if the head keeps climbing during an extreme storm.

How do I choose the right Discharge Coefficient (Cd) for my situation?

Cd depends on the physical shape of the crest: a broad-crested weir, with a flat top wide enough that flow re-establishes parallel streamlines across it, typically uses a lower coefficient around 1.7; a sharp-crested weir, a thin plate or wall edge, uses a higher coefficient around 1.84 because the water separates cleanly from the crest; and an ogee crest, the S-curved profile common on large concrete dam spillways, uses the highest coefficient, around 2.2, because its shape is specifically engineered to hug the underside of the nappe (the falling sheet of water) and minimize energy loss. Match your selection to the actual physical crest shape you're modeling rather than assuming one value applies universally.

Does a longer spillway (more Weir/Spillway Length) always increase discharge as much as more head does?

Discharge is directly proportional to crest length, so doubling length exactly doubles discharge at a fixed head — a straightforward linear relationship, unlike head's 1.5-power effect. In practice this means adding physical crest length is a predictable, linear way to add capacity, while relying on head to add capacity is nonlinear and, once a reservoir rises meaningfully above design levels, can escalate discharge faster than a fixed-length spillway or downstream channel can safely handle.

Is this calculator's output sufficient to certify an actual dam spillway's safety?

No — this applies the standard free-flow weir equation for a preliminary, planning-level capacity estimate only, and does not model submerged or tailwater-affected flow, the actual measured or as-built crest profile (versus an idealized coefficient for its category), approach channel losses, gate operations on a controlled spillway, or comparison against a site-specific design flood such as the probable maximum flood. Actual dam spillway design and any safety certification requires full USBR or USACE hydraulic design procedures, often physical or numerical model testing of the specific structure, and review by a qualified dam safety engineer.

The questions that sit next to this one — chosen by subject, including calculators filed under a different category.

More in Environment, Weather & Climate.