Skip to main content
Calcimator

HVAC Filtration Efficiency Calculator

MERV rating selection from particle size targets.

About this calculator

MERV (Minimum Efficiency Reporting Value) ratings are only meaningful relative to the particle size you actually care about, and this calculator makes that explicit by looking up three separate efficiency bands per ASHRAE Standard 52.2, Method of Testing General Ventilation Air-Cleaning Devices for Removal Efficiency by Particle Size: E1 covers the finest particles (0.3–1.0 µm — smoke, bacteria), E2 the mid-range (1.0–3.0 µm — mold spores, fine dust), and E3 the coarse fraction (3.0–10.0 µm — pollen, dust mite debris). Enter your MERV rating and a target particle diameter, and the calculator routes to the matching band's minimum composite efficiency rather than reporting a single blended number — a MERV 13 filter, for instance, catches only 50% of E1 particles but 85–90% of E2 and E3, so "MERV 13" alone doesn't tell you how well it handles smoke versus pollen. The calculator also converts your system's airflow and filter face area into face velocity (fpm), since pressure drop scales with how fast air is forced through the media, and estimates the resulting fan power penalty and annual electricity cost at $0.12/kWh assuming continuous 24/7 operation and 65% fan efficiency.

The efficiency table itself is a set of representative ASHRAE 52.2 minimum values, not a specific manufacturer's certified test data — real filters vary within a MERV band, and efficiency also degrades as filters load with dust (this only models the clean-filter case). The most common mixup: a higher MERV number isn't free — it raises pressure drop and energy cost, so match the rating to your actual filtration goal (PM2.5 filtration needs MERV 13+, since E1/E2 performance lags badly below that) rather than defaulting to the highest number available.

Inputs

Results

Filtration efficiency (%)

85

Pressure drop (in. w.g.)0.27
Face velocity (fpm)300
Fan power increase (W)14.6
Annual energy cost ($)$15.31
E1: 0.3–1.0 µm (%)50
E2: 1.0–3.0 µm (%)85
E3: 3.0–10.0 µm (%)90

Figures current as of 2025. Source: ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 52.2-2025, Method of Testing General Ventilation Air-Cleaning Devices for Removal Efficiency by Particle Size

How to Use This Calculator
  1. Enter MERV rating (1–16), Target particle size (µm), and System airflow (CFM).
  2. Set Filter face area (ft²).
  3. Review the Filtration efficiency (%) result.
  4. Use Pressure drop (in. w.g.) and Face velocity (fpm) to inform your decision.

How the result changes with MERV rating (1–16)

MERV rating (1–16)Filtration efficiency (%)
6.50
9.7550
1695

What each input means

MERV rating (1–16)
MERV 8 = residential, 13 = commercial/IAQ, 16 = hospital.
Target particle size (µm)
Particle diameter in microns. PM2.5 = 2.5, PM10 = 10, bacteria ~1, pollen ~10.
System airflow (CFM)
Total HVAC system airflow in cubic feet per minute.
Filter face area (ft²)
Total filter face area. Standard 20×20 = 2.78 ft², 24×24 = 4 ft².

What each result means

Filtration efficiency (%)
ASHRAE 52.2 minimum efficiency for the target particle size at this MERV rating.
Pressure drop (in. w.g.)
Clean filter pressure drop at the given face velocity.
Face velocity (fpm)
Air velocity through the filter face. Target 300–500 fpm for pleated filters.
Fan power increase (W)
Additional fan power consumed by this filter's resistance.
Annual energy cost ($)
Extra electricity cost per year from filter resistance at $0.12/kWh.
E1: 0.3–1.0 µm (%)
Efficiency for finest particles (smoke, bacteria).
E2: 1.0–3.0 µm (%)
Efficiency for medium particles (mold spores).
E3: 3.0–10.0 µm (%)
Efficiency for large particles (pollen, dust).

How this is calculated

Worked example, using the default values

  1. Identify Input Parameters
    4 parameters
    MERV rating (1–16) = 13, Target particle size (µm) = 2.5, System airflow (CFM) = 1200, Filter face area (ft²) = 4 = 4 input(s) provided
  2. Calculate Filtration efficiency
    Filtration efficiency
    85 = 85
  3. Calculate Pressure drop
    Pressure drop = baseDP * (faceVelocity / 500)
    0.27 = 0.27
  4. Calculate Face velocity
    Face velocity = airflowCfm / filterAreaSqFt
    300 = 300

Figures and sources

Engine last updated . Checked against 2 independently-derived tests — how we verify calculators. Built by Paul Gunder, a software engineer, not a licensed financial, medical, or legal professional.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why does my MERV 13 filter show 85% efficiency for one particle size but only 50% for another?

MERV ratings are actually three separate efficiency numbers (E1, E2, E3) collapsed into one headline value based on the worst-performing band. This calculator looks up all three bands independently: at MERV 13, the E1 band (0.3–1.0 µm smoke and bacteria) sits at only 50% while E2 and E3 (mold spores, pollen) hit 85–90%. The single "MERV 13" label hides that gap, so enter your actual target particle size rather than assuming uniform performance across the board.

Will going from MERV 8 to MERV 13 actually reduce my HVAC airflow?

Not by itself — this calculator's pressure drop model depends on face velocity (CFM ÷ filter area), not MERV rating directly, though higher-MERV filters do carry a higher base pressure drop at the same 500 fpm reference velocity (0.25" w.g. at MERV 8 versus 0.45" w.g. at MERV 13 in this model). If you keep the same filter face area when upgrading, expect roughly 80% more resistance and a proportionally larger fan power penalty, which the calculator quantifies as additional watts and annual energy cost.

Why does the calculator ask for filter face area separately from airflow?

Because pressure drop and filtration performance both depend on face velocity, not airflow alone — the same 1,200 CFM forced through a small 2 ft² filter creates much higher velocity (and pressure drop) than through a larger 4 ft² filter. The calculator divides your CFM input by filter area to get face velocity in fpm, which is the value actually used to scale the pressure drop estimate. A larger filter area at the same airflow lowers pressure drop and energy cost without changing filtration efficiency.

Is the annual energy cost figure realistic for my specific system?

It's a rough estimate assuming continuous 24/7 fan operation, 65% fan efficiency, and $0.12/kWh electricity — all fixed assumptions in the formula (additional HP = ΔP × CFM / (6356 × 0.65)). If your system cycles rather than running continuously, your local electricity rate differs, or your fan's actual efficiency is different, the real annual cost will scale proportionally from this baseline rather than matching it exactly.

The questions that sit next to this one — chosen by subject, including calculators filed under a different category.

More in Environment, Weather & Climate.