Skip to main content
Calcimator

Reinsurance Pricing Calculator

Price excess-of-loss reinsurance layers with technical premium, risk load, brokerage, and rate on line calculations.

About this calculator

Excess-of-loss reinsurance only pays for losses that fall inside a specific layer — above an attachment point (retention) and below an exhaustion point (attachment plus limit) — so pricing that layer requires figuring out exactly how much of the underlying loss distribution's expected value actually lands inside that narrow band. This calculator uses a single-parameter Pareto (Lomax) severity model, a standard heavy-tailed distribution shape actuaries commonly assume for property catastrophe and large-loss exposures, and computes the Limited Expected Value (LEV) — the expected loss capped at a given dollar retention — at both the attachment and exhaustion points, following the methodology laid out in the standard actuarial reference text Loss Models: From Data to Decisions (Klugman, Panjer & Willmot), Chapter 5. The difference between those two LEV figures is the technical premium: the pure, no-markup expected cost of the layer, representing what the reinsurer would need to collect on average just to break even on claims. Two loadings then get layered on top of that technical premium.

Risk load compensates the reinsurer for the genuine uncertainty in that estimate and for the capital it has to hold against the layer, typically 10-25% of technical premium. Brokerage is a broker's commission calculated on the already risk-loaded premium, not the raw technical premium, since it's compensation for placing the full loaded transaction. Rate on line — total premium divided by the layer's limit — is the single most-watched benchmark in reinsurance markets, since it lets buyers and sellers compare layer pricing across different attachment points and limits on a common, apples-to-apples percentage basis.

Inputs

$
$
$

Results

Total Premium

$969,118.00

Rate on Line (%)

9.69%

Technical Premium$766,101.00
Risk Load Amount$114,915.00
Brokerage Amount$88,102.00
Payback Period (years)10.3

Figures current as of 2008. Source: Klugman, S.A., Panjer, H.H., and Willmot, G.E., Loss Models: From Data to Decisions, 3rd ed., Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics

How to Use This Calculator
  1. Enter the cedant's expected loss distribution or aggregate loss statistics.
  2. Set the reinsurance attachment point and limit.
  3. Input a risk load factor.
  4. Review the expected reinsurance loss cost and the loaded reinsurance premium.
  5. Compare the rate-on-line to market benchmarks from recent treaty placements.

How the result changes with Expected Loss

Expected LossTotal PremiumRate on Line (%)
$1,000,000.00$400,369.004%
$1,500,000.00$678,823.006.79%
$3,000,000.00$1,549,303.0015.49%
$5,000,000.00$2,619,901.0026.2%

What each input means

Expected Loss
Expected annual loss for the reinsurance layer
Attachment Point
Dollar amount where the reinsurance layer begins (retention)
Layer Limit
Maximum coverage provided by the reinsurance layer
Risk Load (%)
Percentage markup for uncertainty and profit (typically 10-25%)
Brokerage (%)
Reinsurance broker commission percentage

How this is calculated

Worked example, using the default values

  1. Define the reinsurance layer
    Layer = Attachment xs Limit
    $5,000,000 xs $10,000,000 (exhaustion at $15,000,000) = Layer: $5,000,000 to $15,000,000
  2. Calculate LEV at attachment and exhaustion
    LEV(d) = (θ/(α−1)) × [1 − (θ/(θ+d))^(α−1)]
    LEV(5,000,000) = $1,861,910, LEV(15,000,000) = $2,628,011 = Layer factor = 38.31%
  3. Compute technical premium (expected ceded loss)
    Technical Premium = LEV(A+L) − LEV(A)
    $2,628,011 − $1,861,910 = $766,101
  4. Apply risk load
    Risk Load = Technical Premium × Risk Load %
    $766,101 × 15% = $114,915
  5. Apply brokerage
    Brokerage = (Technical + Risk Load) × Brokerage %
    $881,016 × 10% = $88,102
  6. Total premium and rate on line
    Rate on Line = Total Premium / Limit × 100
    $969,118 / $10,000,000 = 9.69% ROL, 10.3 yr payback

Figures and sources

Engine last updated . Checked against 2 independently-derived tests — how we verify calculators. Built by Paul Gunder, a software engineer, not a licensed financial, medical, or legal professional.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why does moving the attachment point higher reduce the technical premium, even with the same limit?

A higher attachment point pushes the reinsurance layer further into the tail of the loss distribution, where losses are less frequent and each additional dollar of coverage picks up a shrinking share of the total expected loss. Since technical premium is exactly the portion of expected loss that falls between the attachment and exhaustion points, moving that window further out into a thinner part of the distribution captures less expected loss and therefore prices lower.

Why is brokerage calculated on the risk-loaded premium instead of the raw technical premium?

The broker's commission compensates for placing the entire loaded transaction the cedant actually pays for, which includes both the pure expected loss cost and the risk load compensating the reinsurer for uncertainty and capital. Calculating brokerage only on the technical premium would understate the commission relative to the full economic value of the deal the broker actually arranged.

What does rate on line actually tell an underwriter that technical premium alone doesn't?

Rate on line expresses total premium as a percentage of the layer's limit, which makes layers of very different sizes and attachment points directly comparable on one common scale — a $2 million premium sounds large in isolation, but whether it's cheap or expensive depends entirely on whether it's covering a $5 million or $50 million limit. This is exactly why rate on line, not raw premium dollars, is the standard benchmark reinsurance markets actually quote and compare.

Why does this calculator use a Pareto distribution instead of a normal distribution for losses?

Large property and catastrophe losses are heavy-tailed — extreme losses occur more often, and can be far larger relative to the average, than a normal (bell-curve) distribution would predict. The Pareto distribution is a standard actuarial choice specifically because it captures that heavy-tail behavior realistically, which matters enormously for excess-of-loss layers that sit high up in the loss distribution, precisely where a normal distribution would badly underestimate the real probability of a large loss — this is the same single-parameter Pareto/Lomax severity model and Limited Expected Value approach set out in Klugman, Panjer & Willmot's Loss Models: From Data to Decisions, the standard actuarial text on severity modeling for excess-of-loss pricing.

The questions that sit next to this one — chosen by subject, including calculators filed under a different category.

More in Insurance.