Skip to main content
Calcimator

Thermal Spray Calculator

Calculate thermal spray coating feedstock consumption, deposit efficiency, and costs for HVOF, plasma, wire arc, and flame spray.

About this calculator

Thermal spray coating amount starts from simple geometry: the coating's volume is surface area times target thickness (converted from mils to inches), and multiplying that volume by the feedstock material's density gives the actual weight of coating that ends up on the part. The harder number to pin down is how much feedstock you have to buy to get that coating weight, because spray processes don't deposit everything they emit — some material bounces off or drifts past the part as overspray. This calculator applies a deposit efficiency specific to the process you select: 70% for HVOF, 55% for plasma spray, 78% for wire arc, and 48% for flame spray, reflecting how wire arc's electric-arc melting wastes comparatively little material while flame spray's combustion-driven stream loses much more.

Dividing the target coating weight by that efficiency gives total feedstock required, and the difference between feedstock required and coating weight is reported directly as overspray waste — a number worth watching since it's pure cost with no coating benefit. Spray time comes from dividing feedstock required by your feed rate, and total cost adds feedstock material cost, labor at your hourly rate for that spray time, and a gas/consumable cost that's scaled per process (HVOF's fuel-and-oxygen combustion runs highest, wire arc's electricity-only process runs lowest). The deposit efficiency values are representative industry figures, not calibrated to your specific gun, nozzle, or standoff distance, so treat this as a planning and quoting tool — real production efficiency should be validated against your own coupon tests, especially for complex geometries where line-of-sight spray coverage is harder to achieve.

Inputs

Results

Feedstock required (lbs)

0.41

Total cost ($)

$13.90

Coating weight (lbs)0.29
Overspray waste (lbs)0.12
Deposit efficiency (%)70
Spray time (minutes)1.7
Feedstock cost ($)$10.32
Labor cost ($)$2.34
Gas/consumables ($)$1.24
Cost per sq in ($)$0.14
How to Use This Calculator
  1. Enter Surface area (sq in), Target thickness (mils), and Spray process (1-4).
  2. Set Coating density (lb/in³), Feed rate (lb/hr), and Feedstock cost ($/lb).
  3. Adjust Labor rate ($/hr) as needed.
  4. Review Feedstock required (lbs) and Total cost ($) ($).
  5. Use Coating weight (lbs) and Overspray waste (lbs) to inform your decision.

How the result changes with Surface area (sq in)

Surface area (sq in)Feedstock required (lbs)Total cost ($)
500.21$6.95
750.31$10.42
1500.62$20.85
2501.03$34.75

What each input means

Surface area (sq in)
Part surface area in square inches.
Target thickness (mils)
Desired coating thickness in mils.
Spray process (1-4)
1=HVOF, 2=Plasma, 3=Wire arc, 4=Flame spray.
Coating density (lb/in³)
Density of coating material.
Feed rate (lb/hr)
Feedstock feed rate.
Feedstock cost ($/lb)
Feedstock material cost per pound.
Labor rate ($/hr)
Operator labor rate per hour.

What each result means

Coating weight (lbs)
Weight of coating deposited on part.
Feedstock required (lbs)
Total feedstock needed including overspray losses.
Overspray waste (lbs)
Feedstock lost to overspray.
Deposit efficiency (%)
Percentage of feedstock that lands on the part.
Spray time (minutes)
Estimated spraying time.
Feedstock cost ($)
Total feedstock material cost.
Labor cost ($)
Operator labor cost.
Gas/consumables ($)
Estimated gas and consumable costs.
Total cost ($)
Total coating cost.
Cost per sq in ($)
Unit cost per square inch coated.

How this is calculated

Worked example, using the default values

  1. Identify Input Parameters
    4 parameters
    Surface area (sq in) = 100, Target thickness (mils) = 10, Spray process (1-4) = 1, Coating density (lb/in³) = 0.289 = 7 input(s) provided
  2. Calculate Feedstock required
    Feedstock required = coatingWeightLbs / de
    0.41 = 0.41
  3. Calculate Total cost
    Total cost = feedstockCost + laborCost + gasCost
    13.9 = $13.9
  4. Calculate Coating weight
    Coating weight = coatingVolumeCuIn * coatingDensityLbIn3
    0.289 = 0.289
  5. Calculate Overspray waste
    Overspray waste = feedstockRequiredLbs - coatingWeightLbs
    0.12 = 0.12

Engine last updated . Checked against 2 independently-derived tests — how we verify calculators. Built by Paul Gunder, a software engineer, not a licensed financial, medical, or legal professional.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why does wire arc spray need less feedstock than HVOF for the same coating weight?

The calculator assigns wire arc a 78% deposit efficiency versus 70% for HVOF, so less feedstock is wasted as overspray. Wire arc melts feedstock with an electric arc between two wires and has comparatively little of the material bounce away, while HVOF's high-velocity combustion-driven stream loses more material past the part, especially on smaller or angled targets.

What exactly counts as "overspray waste" in the results?

Overspray waste is calculated as feedstock required minus coating weight — the portion of feedstock you have to buy and feed into the gun that never ends up as coating on the part. It's driven entirely by the deposit efficiency for your chosen process, so switching from flame spray (48% efficiency) to wire arc (78%) at the same target coating weight roughly halves the overspray waste.

How is total spray time determined, and what changes it besides part size?

Spray time is feedstock required divided by your feed rate (lb/hr). Since feedstock required already accounts for deposit efficiency, a less efficient process like plasma spray (55%) needs more total feedstock — and therefore more spray time at the same feed rate — than a more efficient one like wire arc, even for an identical target coating weight and part area.

Why does the gas/consumables cost vary so much between processes?

The calculator applies a per-process gas cost multiplier — 1.5 for HVOF, 1.2 for plasma, 0.8 for flame spray, and only 0.6 for wire arc — multiplied by spray time and a base rate. This reflects that HVOF burns fuel and oxygen continuously to generate its high-velocity flame, while wire arc uses electricity and compressed air rather than combustion gases, making it the cheapest process here on consumables even before labor and feedstock are counted.

The questions that sit next to this one — chosen by subject, including calculators filed under a different category.

More in Manufacturing, Industrial & Coatings.