Skip to main content
Calcimator

Wells Score for PE Calculator

Calculate the Wells score for pulmonary embolism (PE) probability using clinical prediction criteria.

About this calculator

The Wells score for pulmonary embolism, from Wells et al.'s 2000 derivation study (Thrombosis and Haemostasis), sums seven clinical findings with three different point weights rather than a flat 1-point-per-item checklist: clinical signs of DVT and PE being the most likely diagnosis each carry 3 points -- the heaviest weight in the score -- tachycardia over 100 bpm, recent immobilization or surgery, and a prior DVT or PE each carry 1.5 points, and hemoptysis and active malignancy each carry 1 point. This calculator reports both the traditional three-tier model (low, moderate, high probability) and a simplified two-tier dichotomized model from the later Christopher study (score ≤4 "PE unlikely" vs. >4 "PE likely"), which is now more common in emergency-department protocols because it maps directly onto whether to order a D-dimer or go straight to CT pulmonary angiography.

Per Wells et al., Ann Intern Med 2001;135(2):98-107, three-tier low risk (score 0-1) carried a 1.3% PE prevalence, moderate risk (2-6) carried 16.2%, and high risk (>6) carried 37.5% -- none of these findings, on their own, rule PE in or out; they estimate pre-test probability to guide which diagnostic test comes next.

Inputs

Results

Wells Score

0pts

Risk (3-Tier)

1(1=Low, 2=Moderate, 3=High)

PE Prevalence1.3%
PE Likely (2-Tier)0(0=Unlikely, 1=Likely)

Figures current as of 2000. Source: Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M, et al. Derivation of a simple clinical model to categorize patients probability of pulmonary embolism: increasing the models utility with the SimpliRED D-dimer. Thromb Haemost. 2000;83(3):416-420.

How to Use This Calculator
  1. Enter 0 or 1 for each Wells PE criterion (DVT signs, HR > 100, immobilization, prior DVT/PE, hemoptysis, malignancy, PE most likely).
  2. Review Wells PE Score and pre-test probability — use to guide CTPA vs. D-dimer decision.
  3. Score ≤ 4 with negative D-dimer has high negative predictive value for PE.

What each input means

Clinical Signs of DVT
Leg swelling and pain with palpation of deep veins (+3 points).
PE Most Likely Diagnosis
PE is the most likely or equally likely diagnosis (+3 points).
Heart Rate > 100 bpm
Tachycardia with heart rate exceeding 100 bpm (+1.5 points).
Immobilization / Surgery
Immobilization >=3 days or surgery in past 4 weeks (+1.5 points).
Previous DVT/PE
Previously objectively diagnosed DVT or PE (+1.5 points).
Hemoptysis
Coughing up blood (+1 point).
Malignancy
Treatment within 6 months or palliative care (+1 point).

How this is calculated

Worked example, using the default values

  1. Identify Input Parameters
    4 parameters
    Clinical Signs of DVT = 0, PE Most Likely Diagnosis = 0, Heart Rate > 100 bpm = 0, Immobilization / Surgery = 0 = 7 input(s) provided
  2. Calculate Wells Score
    Wells Score
    0 = 0
  3. Calculate Risk
    Risk
    1 = 1
  4. Calculate PE Prevalence
    PE Prevalence
    1.3 = 1.3%
  5. Calculate PE Likely
    PE Likely
    0 = 0

Figures and sources

Engine last updated . Checked against 3 independently-derived tests — how we verify calculators. Built by Paul Gunder, a software engineer, not a licensed financial, medical, or legal professional.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why do some Wells criteria count for 3 points while others only count for 1?

The Wells score is not an equal-weight checklist. Clinical signs of DVT and "PE is the most likely diagnosis" each carry 3 points because they were the strongest predictors in the original derivation study; tachycardia, recent immobilization or surgery, and a prior DVT/PE each carry 1.5 points; and hemoptysis and active malignancy each carry 1 point as the weakest predictors. The point values reflect how strongly each finding predicted a confirmed PE in that derivation cohort, not how easy each finding is to check for.

What's the difference between the 3-tier and 2-tier Wells score models?

The original 3-tier model sorts patients into low (score 0-1), moderate (2-6), or high (>6) probability bands, each with its own PE prevalence. The simplified 2-tier model, introduced by the later Christopher study, collapses those into just "PE unlikely" (score 4 or below) versus "PE likely" (above 4). The 2-tier version is more common in emergency protocols today because it maps directly onto a single decision: order a D-dimer for "unlikely," or proceed straight to CT pulmonary angiography for "likely."

Does a low Wells score rule out pulmonary embolism?

Not by itself. Low risk (score 0-1) carried roughly a 1.3% PE prevalence in the original derivation cohort -- reassuring, but not zero. The standard next step for a low or "PE unlikely" score is a D-dimer test; a negative D-dimer in that setting has a high negative predictive value and can reasonably exclude PE without imaging, but the Wells score alone, without a following D-dimer or imaging, does not rule PE out.

What does it mean when a patient's Wells score puts them in the 'high probability' band?

High probability (score above 6 in the 3-tier model) carried roughly a 37.5% PE prevalence in the original derivation cohort -- meaning more than a third of patients scoring in that range actually had a confirmed PE. At that pre-test probability, D-dimer testing is generally skipped because even a negative result wouldn't lower the probability enough to be reassuring, and patients typically proceed directly to CT pulmonary angiography or another definitive imaging study.

The questions that sit next to this one — chosen by subject, including calculators filed under a different category.

More in Medical & Clinical.