Skip to main content
Calcimator

Vertical Feet Tracker Calculator

Track your season vertical feet, estimate calories burned, and see how your skiing stacks up against climbing Mount Everest. Enter your runs, vertical per run, and days skied.

About this calculator

This calculator tallies your ski season by multiplying three numbers you already track — runs per day, vertical feet per run, and days skied — into a season-long vertical feet total, then converts that single figure into a handful of more tangible benchmarks. The metric conversion is a straight multiplication by 0.3048 feet-to-meters, and the mileage figure just divides by 5,280 feet per mile, both exact unit conversions with nothing skiing-specific about them. The calorie estimate is the one figure built on an assumption: it multiplies total vertical feet by your body weight and a fixed per-foot-per-pound constant (0.00027), calibrated so a 180-pound skier logging a 30,000-foot day burns roughly 1,460 calories — a plausible full-day total, but a rough proxy rather than a measured value, since it doesn't account for lift time, trail pitch, snow conditions, or skiing intensity, all of which change real energy expenditure.

The Everest-ascents figure is purely for fun: it divides your total vertical feet by 29,032, the mountain's height, so logging that many ascents means you've descended the equivalent elevation, not that you've actually climbed anything. Because the inputs are per-day averages rather than day-by-day logs, the accuracy of every output depends on how representative your typical run count and vertical estimate really are — a few outlier powder days or a lift closure can shift the true season total noticeably from what a flat average predicts.

Inputs

ft
lbs

Results

Total Vertical Feet

225,000

Total Vertical Meters68,580 m
Estimated Calories Burned10,328 cal
Everest Ascents Equivalent7.75
Miles Descended42.61 mi
How to Use This Calculator
  1. Enter Runs Per Day, Vertical Per Run, and Days Skied.
  2. Set Skier Weight.
  3. Review the Total Vertical Feet result.
  4. Use Total Vertical Meters (m) and Estimated Calories Burned (cal) to inform your decision.

How the result changes with Vertical Per Run

Vertical Per RunTotal Vertical Feet
750112,500
1,125168,750
2,250337,500
3,750562,500

What each input means

Runs Per Day
Average number of lift-served runs you take per ski day. Typical range is 6–15 runs.
Vertical Per Run
Average vertical drop per run in feet. Check your resort's trail map for lift-served vertical.
Days Skied
Total number of ski days this season. Average season pass holder skis 8–20 days.
Skier Weight
Your weight in pounds, used to estimate calories burned. Heavier skiers burn more energy.

What each result means

Total Vertical Feet
Total vertical feet descended over the season. Elite skiers log over 1 million feet per season.
Total Vertical Meters
Total vertical descent in meters.
Estimated Calories Burned
Approximate total calories burned from skiing. Based on weight and vertical feet as a proxy for effort.
Everest Ascents Equivalent
How many times you descended the height of Mount Everest (29,032 ft). A fun benchmark for your season.
Miles Descended
Total vertical distance converted to miles.

How this is calculated

Worked example, using the default values

  1. Identify Input Parameters
    4 parameters
    Runs Per Day = 10, Vertical Per Run = 1500, Days Skied = 15, Skier Weight = 170 = 4 input(s) provided
  2. Calculate Total Vertical Feet
    Total Vertical Feet
    225000 = 225000
  3. Calculate Total Vertical Meters
    Total Vertical Meters
    68580 = 68580
  4. Calculate Estimated Calories Burned
    Estimated Calories Burned
    10328 = 10328

Engine last updated . Checked against 2 independently-derived tests — how we verify calculators. Built by Paul Gunder, a software engineer, not a licensed financial, medical, or legal professional.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is the calorie estimate less precise than the vertical feet and mileage figures?

Vertical feet, meters, and miles are all exact unit conversions with fixed constants (0.3048 m/ft, 5,280 ft/mi), so they're only as accurate as the inputs you give. Calories, by contrast, use a fixed calibration constant (0.00027 calories per vertical foot per pound of body weight) tuned so a 180-pound skier logging 30,000 vertical feet lands around 1,460 calories — a reasonable full-day estimate, but one that ignores lift time, trail pitch, snow conditions, and skiing intensity.

Why does the calculator ask for Runs Per Day instead of just total season vertical?

Multiplying runs per day × vertical per run × days skied lets you build a season total from numbers you actually track on the hill, rather than requiring you to already know a season aggregate. The tradeoff is that it treats every day as identical to your averages, so a handful of unusually big powder days or a lift closure can push your real season total meaningfully away from what the flat average predicts.

How is the Everest Ascents Equivalent calculated, and does it mean I climbed that many mountains?

It divides your total vertical feet by 29,032 (Mount Everest's height) — nothing more. It measures cumulative descended elevation, not actual ascents, so logging 'three Everest ascents' means you've gone downhill three mountain-heights' worth over the season, not that you climbed anything.

Does skier weight affect anything besides the calorie estimate?

No — skier weight only feeds into the calories-burned calculation. Total vertical feet, meters, miles descended, and the Everest-ascents figure are all derived purely from runs per day, vertical per run, and days skied, and don't change based on body weight.

The questions that sit next to this one — chosen by subject, including calculators filed under a different category.

More in Sports, Outdoors & Recreation.