Model Compression Calculator
Calculate compressed model size after pruning, quantization, and distillation with accuracy impact estimates.
About this calculator
This calculator chains together the three most common neural-network compression techniques in the order a real pipeline would apply them: pruning first, then quantization, then knowledge distillation. Pruning removes a percentage of near-zero-value weights, shrinking the model's size in direct proportion to Pruning %. Quantization then reduces how many bytes each remaining weight takes to store -- for a given Original Model Size, switching the Quantization Bits setting moves the final Compressed Size more than an equivalent adjustment to Pruning % or Distillation Ratio, because it is a discrete jump between fixed byte-width multipliers (FP32 at 4 bytes down to INT4 at 0.5 bytes, an 8x range) rather than a smooth percentage adjustment.
Distillation Ratio applies last, dividing whatever size pruning and quantization already produced -- raising it always shrinks the result further, and raising Pruning % or lowering Original Model Size always shrinks it too. Estimated Accuracy Impact adds up rough, independent per-technique penalties (pruning at about 0.1% per 10% pruned, quantization by a fixed per-bit-width lookup, distillation scaling with how aggressive the ratio is) rather than modeling how these three techniques might interact when combined, since real interaction effects are highly model- and dataset-dependent. Treat both the size and accuracy figures as planning estimates for a compression pipeline, not a substitute for validating the actual compressed model against your task.
Inputs
Results
Compressed Size
87.5 MB
≈ 18 songs
Size Reduction
82.5%
How to Use This Calculator
- Enter Original Model Size (MB), Pruning %, and Quantization Bits.
- Set FP32 (no quantization), FP16 (half precision), and INT8.
- Adjust INT4, Distillation Ratio as needed.
- Review Compressed Size (MB) and Size Reduction (%).
- Use Est. Accuracy Impact (%) to inform your decision.
How the result changes with Distillation Ratio
| Distillation Ratio | Compressed Size | Size Reduction |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 87.5 MB | 82.5% |
| 1.5 | 58.3 MB | 88.3% |
| 2.5 | 35 MB | 93% |
What each input means
- Original Model Size (MB)
- Original model size in megabytes (FP32 weights)
- Pruning %
- Percentage of weights to prune (remove near-zero weights)
- Quantization Bits
- Lower bit width = smaller model but potential accuracy loss
- Distillation Ratio
- Student-to-teacher size ratio for knowledge distillation (1 = no distillation)
How this is calculated
Worked example, using the default values
- Identify Input Parameters4 parametersOriginal Model Size (MB) = 500, Pruning % = 30, Quantization Bits = 8, Distillation Ratio = 1 = 4 input(s) provided
- Calculate Compressed SizeCompressed Size87.5 = 87.5
- Calculate Size ReductionSize Reduction82.5 = 82.5%
Engine last updated . Checked against 2 independently-derived tests — how we verify calculators. Built by Paul Gunder, a software engineer, not a licensed financial, medical, or legal professional.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which of the three compression techniques shrinks the model the most?
For a given starting model size, switching the Quantization Bits setting moves Compressed Size more than an equivalent change to Pruning % or Distillation Ratio, because it jumps between fixed byte-width multipliers -- FP32 at 4 bytes per weight down to INT4 at just 0.5 bytes, an 8x range -- rather than applying a smooth percentage adjustment. Pruning and distillation still matter, but neither alone can match the swing a single quantization-level change produces.
Does the order of pruning, quantization, and distillation matter?
In this calculator, yes -- it applies pruning first (removing a percentage of the original size), then quantization (multiplying by a fixed byte-width ratio), then distillation (dividing by the distillation ratio), matching the order a real compression pipeline typically follows. Because pruning and quantization are both simple multiplicative factors, applying them in either order would actually give the same final size mathematically -- distillation dividing last is the step where sequencing genuinely changes the intermediate numbers shown.
Why does INT4 quantization show a bigger accuracy hit than INT8?
Because fewer bits per weight means coarser rounding of each value, and the calculator's accuracy-impact lookup reflects that: it estimates about a 0.5% accuracy impact for INT8 versus about 2% for INT4, a real pattern in published quantization research where accuracy loss grows faster than linearly as bit width drops, since there are exponentially fewer representable values at each step down.
Can I trust the accuracy impact number as an exact prediction?
No -- it is a rough additive estimate built from independent per-technique rules of thumb (a fixed percent per 10% pruned, a fixed percent per quantization level, a fixed percent per distillation step), not a measurement of your specific model and dataset. Real compression techniques often interact in ways a simple sum cannot capture, so always validate a compressed model's actual accuracy on a held- out test set before deploying it.
What does a Distillation Ratio of 1 mean?
A ratio of 1 means no knowledge distillation is applied at all -- the Compressed Size after pruning and quantization is left unchanged, since dividing by 1 has no effect. You would only raise this value if you are training a smaller "student" model to mimic a larger "teacher" model's behavior, which is a separate training process this calculator does not simulate, only account for by size.
Related Calculators
The questions that sit next to this one — chosen by subject, including calculators filed under a different category.
Inference Latency Calculator
Estimate model inference latency, throughput, and memory requirements across CPU, GPU, and edge hardware.
MLOps & AI CostingGPU Training Cost Calculator
Estimate cloud GPU training time, cost, and CO2 emissions for machine learning model training.
MLOps & AI CostingData Annotation Cost Calculator
Estimate labeling costs for ML datasets by task type, dataset size, and annotator rates.
More in Technology & Computing.