Skip to main content
Calcimator

Model Compression Calculator

Calculate compressed model size after pruning, quantization, and distillation with accuracy impact estimates.

About this calculator

This calculator chains together the three most common neural-network compression techniques in the order a real pipeline would apply them: pruning first, then quantization, then knowledge distillation. Pruning removes a percentage of near-zero-value weights, shrinking the model's size in direct proportion to Pruning %. Quantization then reduces how many bytes each remaining weight takes to store -- for a given Original Model Size, switching the Quantization Bits setting moves the final Compressed Size more than an equivalent adjustment to Pruning % or Distillation Ratio, because it is a discrete jump between fixed byte-width multipliers (FP32 at 4 bytes down to INT4 at 0.5 bytes, an 8x range) rather than a smooth percentage adjustment.

Distillation Ratio applies last, dividing whatever size pruning and quantization already produced -- raising it always shrinks the result further, and raising Pruning % or lowering Original Model Size always shrinks it too. Estimated Accuracy Impact adds up rough, independent per-technique penalties (pruning at about 0.1% per 10% pruned, quantization by a fixed per-bit-width lookup, distillation scaling with how aggressive the ratio is) rather than modeling how these three techniques might interact when combined, since real interaction effects are highly model- and dataset-dependent. Treat both the size and accuracy figures as planning estimates for a compression pipeline, not a substitute for validating the actual compressed model against your task.

Inputs

Results

Compressed Size

87.5 MB

≈ 18 songs

Size Reduction

82.5%

Est. Accuracy Impact0.8%
How to Use This Calculator
  1. Enter Original Model Size (MB), Pruning %, and Quantization Bits.
  2. Set FP32 (no quantization), FP16 (half precision), and INT8.
  3. Adjust INT4, Distillation Ratio as needed.
  4. Review Compressed Size (MB) and Size Reduction (%).
  5. Use Est. Accuracy Impact (%) to inform your decision.

How the result changes with Distillation Ratio

Distillation RatioCompressed SizeSize Reduction
187.5 MB82.5%
1.558.3 MB88.3%
2.535 MB93%

What each input means

Original Model Size (MB)
Original model size in megabytes (FP32 weights)
Pruning %
Percentage of weights to prune (remove near-zero weights)
Quantization Bits
Lower bit width = smaller model but potential accuracy loss
Distillation Ratio
Student-to-teacher size ratio for knowledge distillation (1 = no distillation)

How this is calculated

Worked example, using the default values

  1. Identify Input Parameters
    4 parameters
    Original Model Size (MB) = 500, Pruning % = 30, Quantization Bits = 8, Distillation Ratio = 1 = 4 input(s) provided
  2. Calculate Compressed Size
    Compressed Size
    87.5 = 87.5
  3. Calculate Size Reduction
    Size Reduction
    82.5 = 82.5%

Engine last updated . Checked against 2 independently-derived tests — how we verify calculators. Built by Paul Gunder, a software engineer, not a licensed financial, medical, or legal professional.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which of the three compression techniques shrinks the model the most?

For a given starting model size, switching the Quantization Bits setting moves Compressed Size more than an equivalent change to Pruning % or Distillation Ratio, because it jumps between fixed byte-width multipliers -- FP32 at 4 bytes per weight down to INT4 at just 0.5 bytes, an 8x range -- rather than applying a smooth percentage adjustment. Pruning and distillation still matter, but neither alone can match the swing a single quantization-level change produces.

Does the order of pruning, quantization, and distillation matter?

In this calculator, yes -- it applies pruning first (removing a percentage of the original size), then quantization (multiplying by a fixed byte-width ratio), then distillation (dividing by the distillation ratio), matching the order a real compression pipeline typically follows. Because pruning and quantization are both simple multiplicative factors, applying them in either order would actually give the same final size mathematically -- distillation dividing last is the step where sequencing genuinely changes the intermediate numbers shown.

Why does INT4 quantization show a bigger accuracy hit than INT8?

Because fewer bits per weight means coarser rounding of each value, and the calculator's accuracy-impact lookup reflects that: it estimates about a 0.5% accuracy impact for INT8 versus about 2% for INT4, a real pattern in published quantization research where accuracy loss grows faster than linearly as bit width drops, since there are exponentially fewer representable values at each step down.

Can I trust the accuracy impact number as an exact prediction?

No -- it is a rough additive estimate built from independent per-technique rules of thumb (a fixed percent per 10% pruned, a fixed percent per quantization level, a fixed percent per distillation step), not a measurement of your specific model and dataset. Real compression techniques often interact in ways a simple sum cannot capture, so always validate a compressed model's actual accuracy on a held- out test set before deploying it.

What does a Distillation Ratio of 1 mean?

A ratio of 1 means no knowledge distillation is applied at all -- the Compressed Size after pruning and quantization is left unchanged, since dividing by 1 has no effect. You would only raise this value if you are training a smaller "student" model to mimic a larger "teacher" model's behavior, which is a separate training process this calculator does not simulate, only account for by size.

The questions that sit next to this one — chosen by subject, including calculators filed under a different category.

More in Technology & Computing.