SWR Power Loss Calculator
Calculate percentage of power lost from SWR mismatch. Shows reflected power, mismatch loss, additional feedline loss, and power delivered to antenna.
About this calculator
Standing wave ratio (SWR) measures how well an antenna's impedance matches the feedline and transmitter, and any mismatch reflects some transmitted power back toward the transmitter instead of radiating it. This calculator derives the reflection coefficient Gamma from SWR using Gamma = (SWR-1)/(SWR+1), then computes Power Reflected as Gamma squared times Transmit Power -- so as SWR climbs, an ever-larger share of your Transmit Power is reflected rather than delivered. SWR mismatch does more than just reflect power at the antenna, though: it also increases the loss along the feedline itself beyond the cable's normal matched-line loss, modeled here as an SWR-driven multiplier on Matched Feedline Loss, which is why high SWR is especially costly with long or lossy feedline runs.
System Efficiency (Power to Antenna divided by Transmit Power) depends only on SWR and Matched Feedline Loss -- Transmit Power itself cancels out of that ratio entirely, so a 100-watt and a 1500-watt transmitter see identical efficiency at the same SWR and feedline loss, even though the 1500-watt radio reflects far more raw wattage back toward itself. Most amateur transmitters fold back their power output above roughly 3:1 SWR to protect their final amplifier stage, which is reflected in the Safe for Rig output.
Inputs
Results
Power to Antenna
66.66 W
≈ 7 LED bulbs
Power Reflected
11.11 W
System Efficiency
66.7 %
How to Use This Calculator
- Enter your measured SWR from your antenna analyzer or transmitter's built-in meter.
- Set transmit power (W) and matched feedline loss (dB per 100 ft at your frequency).
- Review power delivered to the antenna, power reflected (W and %), and total mismatch loss (dB).
- Check additional feedline loss due to SWR — high SWR significantly increases cable losses.
- Use the results to decide if an antenna tuner or antenna adjustment is warranted.
How the result changes with Transmit Power
| Transmit Power | Power to Antenna | Power Reflected | System Efficiency |
|---|---|---|---|
| 50 | 33.33 W | 5.56 W | 66.7 % |
| 75 | 49.99 W | 8.33 W | 66.7 % |
| 150 | 99.99 W | 16.67 W | 66.7 % |
| 250 | 166.64 W | 27.78 W | 66.7 % |
What each input means
- SWR
- Standing wave ratio reading from SWR meter or antenna analyzer
- Transmit Power
- Transmitter output power in watts
- Matched Feedline Loss
- Feedline loss when perfectly matched (from coax cable loss calculator)
How this is calculated
Formula
Γ = (SWR-1)/(SWR+1); Reflected% = Γ² × 100Worked example, using the default values
- Identify Input Parameters3 parametersSWR = 2, Transmit Power = 100, Matched Feedline Loss = 1 = 3 input(s) provided
- Calculate Power to AntennaPower to Antenna66.66 = 66.66
- Calculate Power ReflectedPower Reflected11.11 = 11.11
- Calculate System EfficiencySystem Efficiency66.7 = 66.7
- Calculate Power ReflectedPower Reflected11.1 = 11.1
- Calculate Mismatch LossMismatch Loss0.512 = 0.512
Engine last updated . Checked against 2 independently-derived tests — how we verify calculators. Built by Paul Gunder, a software engineer, not a licensed financial, medical, or legal professional.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why doesn't raising my transmit power change my system efficiency?
System Efficiency is Power to Antenna divided by Transmit Power, and both the reflected-power fraction (driven by SWR) and the extra feedline loss (driven by SWR and Matched Feedline Loss) are proportional to whatever power you put in -- so Transmit Power cancels out of the ratio entirely. A 100-watt radio and a 1500-watt radio at the same SWR and feedline loss see the identical percentage efficiency, even though the higher-power radio reflects far more raw wattage.
How much power do I actually lose at a 2:1 SWR?
At a 2:1 SWR, the reflection coefficient Gamma works out to about 0.333, and Power Reflected (Gamma squared times Transmit Power) is roughly 11% of your transmit power -- meaning about 89% is still forwarded toward the antenna before accounting for the additional feedline loss SWR introduces on top of that. Most operators consider 2:1 a reasonably tolerable mismatch, though it's still worth tuning out if you can.
Why is high SWR worse with a long feedline run than a short one?
SWR increases feedline loss beyond the cable's normal matched-line rating, via a multiplier applied to Matched Feedline Loss -- and Matched Feedline Loss itself scales with cable length. So the same SWR mismatch adds a bigger absolute loss penalty on a long run of coax than on a short jumper, which is why minimizing SWR matters even more as your feedline gets longer.
What does Safe for Rig actually check?
Safe for Rig flags whether SWR is at or below 3:1, a commonly cited threshold above which many amateur radio transceivers automatically fold back (reduce) their output power to protect the final amplifier stage from the increased reflected power. It's a general rule of thumb, though -- always check your specific transmitter's actual SWR tolerance in its manual rather than relying on this threshold alone.
Related Calculators
The questions that sit next to this one — chosen by subject, including calculators filed under a different category.
Wire Antenna Calculator
Calculate wire length for dipole, vertical, loop, end-fed, and G5RV antennas by frequency and band. Includes height analysis.
Amateur RadioAntenna Trap Design Calculator
Calculate trap capacitor and inductor values for multi-band wire antennas. Includes coil winding data and impedance analysis.
RF & AntennaDipole Antenna Length Calculator
Calculate half-wave dipole element length from target frequency. Includes quarter-wave, full-wave, and 5/8-wave lengths.
RF & AntennaVSWR & Return Loss Calculator
Convert between VSWR, return loss, reflection coefficient, and mismatch loss. See reflected vs transmitted power.
Amateur RadioRepeater Coverage Calculator
Estimate repeater coverage radius from antenna height, power, terrain type, and mobile antenna parameters.
More in Technology & Computing.