Secretary of Interior Standards Calculator
Compliance scoring against SIS treatment standards.
About this calculator
The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, codified at 36 C.F.R. Part 67 and administered by the National Park Service, are the ten benchmarks the NPS and state historic preservation offices use to judge whether rehabilitation work respects a building's historic character — and passing them is a prerequisite for the 20% federal Historic Tax Credit. This calculator scores each standard on a 0-10 scale (compatible new use, retaining historic character, treating the building as a physical record of its era, preserving features that have gained their own significance, and preserving distinctive materials and craftsmanship as the first five; Standards 6 through 10, covering repair versus replacement, chemical/physical treatments, new additions, and archaeological resources, are combined into a single averaged input to keep the form manageable) and averages all ten into one overall compliance score.
That average is also expressed as a percentage of the maximum possible 10, and it drives two threshold-based flags: an average of 6 or higher is treated as likely to pass NPS/SHPO review, while 7 or higher is treated as likely to also clear the higher bar for HTC eligibility — both are simplified proxies for a real reviewer's judgment call, not a legal determination. The calculator also surfaces your single lowest-scoring standard, since in practice one seriously deficient area (say, replacing character-defining windows) can sink an otherwise strong application even when the average looks fine. Because Standards 6-10 are lumped into one averaged number here, a project with one very weak standard buried in that group (for example, an incompatible new addition) could look better on paper than it will look to an actual reviewer — for a real submission, score each standard individually and consult your SHPO before finalizing plans.
Inputs
Results
Average score (0-10)
7.1
Figures current as of 2026. Source: 36 C.F.R. Part 67, codifying the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, administered by the National Park Service (Technical Preservation Services) as the regulatory basis for evaluating projects seeking the federal Historic Rehabilitation Tax Credit.
How to Use This Calculator
- Score Standards 1–5 individually (0–10): Compatible use, Retain character, Physical record, Preserve significant changes, and Preserve distinctive features.
- Enter the average score for Standards 6–10 (repair, chemical/physical treatments, new additions, and archaeological resources).
- The Average score (0–10) represents overall compliance — scores of 7 or higher generally satisfy NPS and SHPO reviewers.
- Check Passes review (1=yes) to gauge whether the project design is likely approvable for federal certification.
- Review HTC eligible (1=yes) — projects failing review are ineligible for the 20% federal Historic Tax Credit.
- Focus improvement on the Weakest area score — raise the lowest-scoring standard to maximize compliance before submitting plans.
How the result changes with Stds 6-10 avg (0-10)
| Stds 6-10 avg (0-10) | Average score (0-10) |
|---|---|
| 3.5 | 5.35 |
| 5.25 | 6.23 |
| 10 | 8.6 |
What each input means
- Std 1: Compatible use (0-10)
- New use compatible with historic character.
- Std 2: Retain character (0-10)
- Retain historic character.
- Std 3: Physical record (0-10)
- Recognize property as record of its time.
- Std 4: Preserve features (0-10)
- Preserve changes that have acquired significance.
- Std 5: Distinctive features (0-10)
- Preserve distinctive materials, features, spaces.
- Stds 6-10 avg (0-10)
- Average score for Standards 6-10 (repair, chemical/physical treatments, new additions, etc.).
What each result means
- Average score (0-10)
- Average compliance score across all 10 standards.
- Compliance (%)
- Compliance as percentage.
- Passes review (0/1)
- 1 = Likely to pass NPS/SHPO review.
- HTC eligible (0/1)
- 1 = Likely eligible for Historic Tax Credit.
- Weakest area score
- Lowest scoring standard to focus improvement.
How this is calculated
Worked example, using the default values
- Identify Input Parameters4 parametersStd 1: Compatible use (0-10) = 7, Std 2: Retain character (0-10) = 8, Std 3: Physical record (0-10) = 6, Std 4: Preserve features (0-10) = 7 = 6 input(s) provided
- Calculate Average scoreAverage score = round(avgScore * 100) / 1007.1 = 7.1
- Calculate ComplianceCompliance = round((avgScore / 10) * 10000) / 10071 = 71
- Calculate Passes review1 = 1
Figures and sources
- Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation (ten standards) (2026) — 36 C.F.R. Part 67, codifying the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, administered by the National Park Service (Technical Preservation Services) as the regulatory basis for evaluating projects seeking the federal Historic Rehabilitation Tax Credit.
Engine last updated . Checked against 4 independently-derived tests — how we verify calculators. Built by Paul Gunder, a software engineer, not a licensed financial, medical, or legal professional.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why are Standards 6 through 10 lumped into a single averaged score instead of scored individually?
It's a deliberate simplification to keep the input form manageable — those five standards cover repair-vs-replacement, chemical/physical treatments, new construction, and archaeological resources, and scoring them individually would roughly double the form's length. The tradeoff is that a single very weak standard buried in that averaged group, like an incompatible new addition, can be masked by stronger scores in the other four and won't show up as clearly as it would in a real SHPO review.
What's the difference between the 'passes review' threshold and the 'HTC eligible' threshold?
Passes review triggers at an average score of 6 or higher out of 10, while HTC eligible requires both that 6+ threshold and a higher bar of 7 or higher. That reflects the real-world gap between a project NPS or a SHPO might informally accept and the higher standard needed to actually qualify for the 20% federal Historic Tax Credit, since credit certification review tends to be stricter than a general compliance check.
Why does the calculator report my single weakest standard as its own output?
Because a project's average score can look solid while one seriously deficient area — say, replacing character-defining windows — sinks an otherwise strong application in an actual reviewer's eyes. The weakest-standard output takes the minimum across all six input categories (including the combined Standards 6-10 average) so you know exactly where to focus improvement before submitting.
Can I trust a passing score here as a guarantee my project will clear an actual SHPO review?
No — these thresholds are simplified proxies for a real reviewer's judgment call, not a legal determination. The Standards themselves, codified at 36 C.F.R. Part 67, are qualitative and contextual by design, and an actual NPS or SHPO reviewer weighs specifics (materials, precedent, site context) that a 0-10 self-scored average can't fully capture, so use a passing score as a green light to proceed with confidence, not as a substitute for SHPO consultation.
Related Calculators
The questions that sit next to this one — chosen by subject, including calculators filed under a different category.
Adaptive Reuse Calculator
Conversion cost for historic building repurposing.
Heritage PreservationHistoric Building Assessment Calculator
Condition assessment scoring for historic structures.
Heritage PreservationRestoration Cost (Historic) Calculator
Per-SF restoration cost by building era and condition.
ArchaeologySite Preservation Cost Calculator
Estimate conservation cost for an archaeological site based on area, threat level, and preservation method.
More in Creative, Media & Design.