Skip to main content
Calcimator

Liver Fibrosis Score (FIB-4) Calculator

Calculate the FIB-4 index for non-invasive liver fibrosis assessment using age, AST, ALT, and platelet count. Includes APRI score and NAFLD-specific cutoffs.

About this calculator

FIB-4 is a widely used non-invasive index for estimating the likelihood of advanced liver fibrosis (scarring) without a liver biopsy, calculated from age and three routine lab values: AST, ALT, and platelet count, using the published formula (age x AST) / (platelet count x the square root of ALT), exactly as derived by Sterling and colleagues in their original 2006 validation study, which was conducted in a cohort of patients co-infected with HIV and hepatitis C (the APRICOT trial), not a hepatitis-C-only population. FIB-4 rises with age and with AST, and falls as ALT or platelet count rises -- lower platelets are a marker of the portal hypertension that develops with advancing fibrosis, and a higher AST relative to ALT (an elevated AST/ALT, or De Ritis, ratio) is itself a recognized fibrosis marker, which is why AST sits in the numerator and ALT in the denominator rather than the two being averaged. The standard cutoffs (validated in chronic hepatitis C but also widely applied to other chronic liver diseases) treat a score under 1.45 as low risk of advanced fibrosis, 1.45 to 3.25 as indeterminate (typically prompting further testing such as elastography), and above 3.25 as high risk.

A separate, lower set of cutoffs (below 1.30 low risk, 1.30 to 2.67 indeterminate, above 2.67 high risk) is commonly used specifically for NAFLD/MASLD (fatty liver disease) and is shown alongside the standard cutoffs here -- note that some more recent NAFLD-specific guidance further adjusts the indeterminate cutoff upward for patients over 65 to reduce false positives from age alone, an adjustment this calculator does not apply. The APRI score (AST-to-platelet ratio index) is included as an older, independently validated companion non-invasive marker. No non-invasive score substitutes for elastography or biopsy when the clinical picture is ambiguous or when the result will change management.

Inputs

Results

FIB-4 Index

1.37

Risk Category (0–2)

0

NAFLD Risk (0–2)1
AST/ALT Ratio (De Ritis)1
APRI Score0.38
APRI Risk (0–2)0
Next Step (0–2)1

Figures current as of 2006. Source: Sterling RK, Lissen E, Clumeck N, Sola R, Correa MC, Montaner J, Sulkowski MS, Torriani FJ, Dieterich DT, Thomas DL, Messinger D, Nelson M; APRICOT Clinical Investigators. Development of a simple noninvasive index to predict significant fibrosis in patients with HIV/HCV coinfection. Hepatology. 2006;43(6):1317-1325.

How to Use This Calculator
  1. Enter the patient's Age in years, AST in U/L, and ALT in U/L from current laboratory results.
  2. Enter Platelet Count in ×10⁹/L to complete the FIB-4 formula.
  3. Review the FIB-4 Index — the primary Risk Category uses the standard cutoffs: below 1.45 suggests low fibrosis risk, above 3.25 suggests advanced fibrosis, in between is indeterminate.
  4. If the underlying condition is NAFLD/MASLD (fatty liver disease), also check the separate NAFLD Risk output, which applies its own lower cutoffs (below 1.30 low, above 2.67 high) to the same FIB-4 score.
  5. Check the APRI Score and AST/ALT Ratio (De Ritis) for additional non-invasive fibrosis markers.
  6. Use the risk category to guide decisions about liver biopsy or specialist referral.

How the result changes with Age (years)

Age (years)FIB-4 IndexRisk Category (0–2)
250.680
381.040
752.051
1002.741

What each input means

Age (years)
Patient age in years. FIB-4 is validated for adults 35–65 years.
AST (U/L)
Aspartate aminotransferase (SGOT) in units per liter.
ALT (U/L)
Alanine aminotransferase (SGPT) in units per liter.
Platelet Count (×10⁹/L)
Platelet count in 10⁹/L (e.g., 200 = 200,000/μL).

What each result means

FIB-4 Index
FIB-4 score. <1.45 = low risk, 1.45–3.25 = indeterminate, >3.25 = high risk.
Risk Category (0–2)
0 = low risk (F0–F1), 1 = indeterminate (need further testing), 2 = high risk (F3–F4).
NAFLD Risk (0–2)
NAFLD-specific cutoffs: 0 = low (<1.30), 1 = indeterminate (1.30–2.67), 2 = high (>2.67).
AST/ALT Ratio (De Ritis)
De Ritis ratio. >1.0 may suggest cirrhosis or alcoholic liver disease.
APRI Score
AST to Platelet Ratio Index. <0.5 = low risk, 0.5–1.5 = indeterminate, >1.5 = high risk.
APRI Risk (0–2)
APRI-based fibrosis risk: 0 = low, 1 = indeterminate, 2 = high.
Next Step (0–2)
0 = routine monitoring, 1 = consider elastography/further testing, 2 = elastography + hepatology referral.

How this is calculated

Worked example, using the default values

  1. Identify Input Parameters
    4 parameters
    Age (years) = 50, AST (U/L) = 30, ALT (U/L) = 30, Platelet Count (×10⁹/L) = 200 = 4 input(s) provided
  2. Calculate FIB-4 Index
    FIB-4 Index = round(fib4 * 100) / 100
    1.37 = 1.37
  3. Calculate Risk Category
    0 = 0
  4. Calculate NAFLD Risk
    1 = 1
  5. Calculate AST/ALT Ratio
    AST/ALT Ratio
    1 = 1

Figures and sources

Engine last updated . Checked against 2 independently-derived tests — how we verify calculators. Built by Paul Gunder, a software engineer, not a licensed financial, medical, or legal professional.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why does a higher platelet count lower the FIB-4 score?

Platelet count sits in the denominator of the FIB-4 formula, so a higher count lowers the calculated score. This reflects real pathophysiology: as fibrosis progresses toward cirrhosis, portal hypertension develops and causes the spleen to sequester more platelets, so a falling platelet count is itself a recognized indirect marker of worsening fibrosis, not just a mathematical artifact of the formula.

Why does ALT lower the score while AST raises it?

AST is in the numerator and ALT (under a square root) is in the denominator, so they pull the score in opposite directions. This mirrors the AST/ALT (De Ritis) ratio, a separately recognized fibrosis marker: a rising AST relative to ALT is associated with more advanced liver disease, so building that same relationship into FIB-4's formula improves its ability to separate low-risk from high-risk patients compared to using either transaminase alone.

Should I use the standard cutoffs or the NAFLD-specific cutoffs?

The original 1.45/3.25 cutoffs were validated in chronic hepatitis C, while the lower 1.30/2.67 cutoffs are commonly used for NAFLD/MASLD (fatty liver disease) specifically, since fibrosis in that population tends to develop differently. If the underlying liver disease isn't hepatitis C or NAFLD, discuss with a hepatologist which cutoff set (if either) is appropriate, since FIB-4 was not independently validated for every chronic liver disease.

Does FIB-4 replace the need for a liver biopsy or elastography?

No -- FIB-4 and the companion APRI score here are screening tools meant to reduce unnecessary biopsies in patients who are clearly low risk and to flag patients who need further workup. A result in the indeterminate range, or a high-risk result with an ambiguous clinical picture, is generally followed by elastography (such as FibroScan) or biopsy for a more definitive fibrosis assessment.

The questions that sit next to this one — chosen by subject, including calculators filed under a different category.

More in Medical & Clinical.