Skip to main content
Calcimator

Child-Pugh Score Calculator

Classify severity of chronic liver disease and cirrhosis using five clinical parameters. Determines Child-Pugh class A, B, or C with survival estimates.

About this calculator

The Child-Pugh (also written Child-Turcotte-Pugh) score is a decades-old, widely used clinical tool for grading the severity of chronic liver disease and cirrhosis. Child and Turcotte first described a version in 1964 to help select candidates for portal-decompression surgery, and Pugh and colleagues modified it in 1973 -- swapping in prothrombin time (the precursor to today's INR) for the original nutritional-status criterion -- giving the score the five-parameter form still used today. It is still routinely used to estimate prognosis and surgical risk even though MELD-based scores have taken over primary responsibility for US liver transplant allocation -- MELD-Na from 2016 until OPTN's July 2023 switch to MELD 3.0, which is the score actually driving waitlist priority now. Five clinical measures are each scored 1 to 3 points -- three from lab values (total bilirubin, serum albumin, and INR, a measure of clotting derived from prothrombin time) and two from clinical assessment (the presence and severity of ascites, or fluid in the abdomen, and hepatic encephalopathy, or liver-related confusion) -- using published cutoffs, so every parameter contributes an equal 1-3 point range regardless of which one is driving the abnormality.

The five point totals are summed for a total score from 5 to 15, which sorts patients into three severity classes: Class A (5-6 points, well-compensated liver disease), Class B (7-9 points, significant functional impairment), and Class C (10-15 points, decompensated disease). Approximate survival and perioperative mortality figures shown alongside the score are commonly cited literature estimates associated with each class rather than a precise formula computed from the score itself, and they vary somewhat between published cohorts -- treat them as an order-of-magnitude prognostic guide, not a specific percentage for an individual patient. Because all five components carry the same 1-3 point weight, no single lab value or clinical finding predictably outweighs the others -- a patient can reach Class C through severe derangement in any combination of the five, which is part of why the score remains useful as a quick composite even though it is coarser than more continuous scores like MELD-Na.

Inputs

Results

Child-Pugh Score

6

Class (1=A, 2=B, 3=C)

1

1-Year Survival (%)100%
2-Year Survival (%)85%
Perioperative Mortality (%)10%
Bilirubin Points1
Albumin Points2
INR Points1
Ascites Points1
Encephalopathy Points1

Figures current as of 1973. Source: Pugh RN, Murray-Lyon IM, Dawson JL, Pietroni MC, Williams R. Transection of the oesophagus for bleeding oesophageal varices. Br J Surg. 1973;60(8):646-649.

How to Use This Calculator
  1. Enter Serum Bilirubin in mg/dL, Serum Albumin in g/dL, and INR from current labs.
  2. Enter Ascites grade (none, mild, or moderate-severe) and Encephalopathy grade.
  3. Review the Total Child-Pugh Score and Class (A, B, or C).
  4. Check 1-Year and 2-Year Survival estimates to guide prognosis discussions.
  5. Use Perioperative Mortality percentage to assess surgical risk in cirrhotic patients.

How the result changes with Serum Albumin (g/dL)

Serum Albumin (g/dL)Child-Pugh ScoreClass (1=A, 2=B, 3=C)
1.7572
2.6372
5.2551
651

What each input means

Total Bilirubin (mg/dL)
Serum total bilirubin. <2 = 1pt, 2–3 = 2pts, >3 = 3pts.
Serum Albumin (g/dL)
Serum albumin. >3.5 = 1pt, 2.8–3.5 = 2pts, <2.8 = 3pts.
INR
International Normalized Ratio. <1.7 = 1pt, 1.7–2.3 = 2pts, >2.3 = 3pts.
Ascites
Select ascites severity.
Encephalopathy
Select encephalopathy grade.

What each result means

Child-Pugh Score
Total score from 5 to 15.
Class (1=A, 2=B, 3=C)
A (5–6): well-compensated, B (7–9): significant impairment, C (10–15): decompensated.
1-Year Survival (%)
Approximate 1-year survival: A ~100%, B ~81%, C ~45%.
2-Year Survival (%)
Approximate 2-year survival: A ~85%, B ~57%, C ~35%.
Perioperative Mortality (%)
Approximate surgical mortality risk: A ~10%, B ~30%, C ~82%.
Bilirubin Points
Points assigned for bilirubin (1–3).
Albumin Points
Points assigned for albumin (1–3).
INR Points
Points assigned for INR (1–3).
Ascites Points
Points assigned for ascites (1–3).
Encephalopathy Points
Points assigned for encephalopathy (1–3).

How this is calculated

Worked example, using the default values

  1. Identify Input Parameters
    4 parameters
    Total Bilirubin (mg/dL) = 1, Serum Albumin (g/dL) = 3.5, INR = 1, Ascites = 0 = 5 input(s) provided
  2. Calculate Child-Pugh Score
    Child-Pugh Score
    6 = 6
  3. Calculate Class
    Class = classCode
    1 = 1
  4. Calculate 1-Year Survival
    100 = 100%
  5. Calculate 2-Year Survival
    85 = 85%

Figures and sources

Engine last updated . Checked against 3 independently-derived tests — how we verify calculators. Built by Paul Gunder, a software engineer, not a licensed financial, medical, or legal professional.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why does higher albumin lower the Child-Pugh score?

Serum albumin is made by the liver, so a failing liver produces less of it -- low albumin is a marker of worse synthetic liver function, which is why the scoring runs in reverse compared to bilirubin and INR: albumin above 3.5 g/dL scores the best (1 point), while albumin below 2.8 g/dL scores the worst (3 points). Rising albumin therefore moves the score down, not up, unlike the other four components.

Can a patient with a mild bilirubin abnormality still land in Class C?

Yes -- each of the five components (bilirubin, albumin, INR, ascites, and encephalopathy) contributes the same 1-to-3-point range, so a patient with only mildly elevated bilirubin but severe ascites and advanced encephalopathy can still accumulate enough total points to reach Class C. No single component is weighted more heavily than the others in the total score.

Is the Child-Pugh score still used now that MELD-based scores exist?

Yes, though for a narrower purpose -- a MELD-based score has replaced Child-Pugh as the primary score driving US liver transplant waitlist priority because it's built from more continuous lab values and updates more responsively. That score itself has changed too: MELD-Na was the allocation standard from 2016 until OPTN switched to MELD 3.0 in July 2023, which is what's actually used for waitlist priority now. Child-Pugh remains widely used at the bedside for general prognosis discussions and for estimating perioperative risk in cirrhotic patients undergoing non-transplant surgery, independent of whichever MELD variant is current for transplant allocation.

Why are ascites and encephalopathy scored by category instead of a lab number?

Unlike bilirubin, albumin, and INR, there's no single blood test that captures fluid accumulation in the abdomen or liver-related confusion -- both are clinical findings assessed by exam and history, so Child-Pugh scores them by severity category (none, mild/controlled, or moderate-to-severe/refractory) rather than a continuous lab value, using the same 1-to-3-point structure as the three lab-based components.

The questions that sit next to this one — chosen by subject, including calculators filed under a different category.

More in Medical & Clinical.