Artifact Classification Score Calculator
Score artifacts using type-variety classification from morphological attributes and contextual data.
About this calculator
Type-variety classification is a long-standing method in archaeology for sorting artifacts -- most often ceramics -- into formal "types" based on a combination of physical attributes rather than any single trait. This calculator scores an artifact against five attribute categories -- morphology (form and structure), decoration, surface treatment, size or completeness, and context integrity -- and combines them into a single weighted score using weights this calculator applies (morphology 35%, decoration 25%, surface treatment 15%, size/completeness 10%, context integrity 15%), not a universal disciplinary standard: different classification systems and different artifact classes (lithics vs. ceramics vs. metal) weight these dimensions differently, so treat the output as one consistent, repeatable scoring scheme rather than the only correct one. Morphology and decoration carry the most weight here because they are typically the most diagnostic attributes for assigning a ceramic vessel to a known type -- a sherd's shape and decorative treatment usually narrow the possibilities faster than its surface finish or fragment size alone.
Context integrity is scored separately from the physical attributes because it measures something different: how reliable the artifact's find-spot information is, not how classifiable the object itself is. A surface find can still be a textbook example of a type (high morphology and decoration scores) while carrying poor context integrity, and a sealed, well-documented deposit can hold a heavily eroded, hard-to-classify fragment. The classification confidence rating and diagnostic status are read directly off the same underlying scores, so a low overall score should point you back to which specific attribute -- morphology, decoration, or something else -- is dragging the classification down.
Inputs
Results
Classification Score
65%
Classification Confidence
Moderate - Probable type assignment
How to Use This Calculator
- Enter Morphology Score, Decoration Score, and Surface Treatment Score.
- Set Size / Completeness and Context Integrity.
- Review Classification Score (%) and Classification Confidence.
- Use Weighted Score (/10) and Diagnostic Status to inform your decision.
- Use the chart to visualize the results and explore different scenarios by adjusting inputs.
How the result changes with Morphology Score
| Morphology Score | Classification Score | Classification Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| 3.5 | 52.8% | Low - Type uncertain |
| 5.25 | 58.9% | Low - Type uncertain |
| 10 | 75.5% | Moderate - Probable type assignment |
What each input means
- Morphology Score
- Form, shape, and structural attributes (1=unrecognizable, 10=perfect type match).
- Decoration Score
- Surface decoration or design elements present (1=none, 10=complete design).
- Surface Treatment Score
- Slip, polish, or surface finish quality (1=eroded, 10=pristine).
- Size / Completeness
- 1=tiny fragment, 10=complete specimen.
- Context Integrity
- Provenience quality (1=surface find, 10=sealed primary context).
How this is calculated
Worked example, using the default values
- Identify Input Parameters5 parametersMorphology Score = 7, Decoration Score = 6, Surface Treatment Score = 5, Size / Completeness = 6, Context Integrity = 8 = 5 input(s) provided
- Calculate Classification ScoreClassification Score65 = 65
- Calculate Classification ConfidenceModerate - Probable type assignment = Moderate - Probable type assignment
- Calculate Weighted ScoreWeighted Score6.5 = 6.5
- Calculate Diagnostic StatusDiagnostic StatusPossibly Diagnostic = Possibly Diagnostic
Engine last updated . Checked against 2 independently-derived tests — how we verify calculators. Built by Paul Gunder, a software engineer, not a licensed financial, medical, or legal professional.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why does morphology carry more weight than surface treatment in this score?
This calculator weights morphology at 35% of the total score, the highest of the five categories, because form and structural attributes are typically the most diagnostic feature archaeologists use to assign an artifact to a known type -- two vessels can have very different surface finishes yet still belong to the same morphological type, while two vessels with the same shape but different decoration are usually classified as different types or varieties. Surface treatment (slip, polish, or finish quality) gets 15% because it is often affected by weathering, soil chemistry, or handling, making it a less reliable long-term indicator than the object's underlying form.
How is diagnostic status different from classification confidence?
Classification confidence reflects the overall weighted score across all five attribute categories, so it can be pulled down by a single weak input like poor context integrity even when the object itself is easy to identify. Diagnostic status looks only at the average of morphology and decoration scores -- the two attributes most directly tied to whether the piece is recognizable as a specific type at all -- so an artifact can register as strongly "Diagnostic" while still carrying a lower overall classification confidence if its context or size scores are weak.
Why does context integrity matter if it doesn't change what the artifact looks like?
Context integrity records how reliable the artifact's find-spot information is -- whether it came from a sealed, primary deposit or a disturbed surface scatter -- which is a separate question from how classifiable the object itself is based on its physical attributes. A well-preserved, highly diagnostic vessel recovered from a disturbed context still carries real uncertainty about its date and cultural association, which is why this calculator scores context integrity independently rather than folding it into the morphology or decoration scores.
Can a fragment with a low size/completeness score still classify with high confidence?
Yes -- size/completeness is only 10% of the total weighted score, so a small or fragmentary piece can still score well overall if its morphology and decoration are clear and well-preserved. A distinctive rim sherd or a diagnostic decorated fragment often carries enough type information to classify confidently even though it represents only a small piece of the original object, which is why this calculator does not let size alone override strong morphological and decorative evidence.
Related Calculators
The questions that sit next to this one — chosen by subject, including calculators filed under a different category.
Ceramic Temper Analysis Calculator
Analyze ceramic thin section point counts to determine temper type, proportion, and porosity.
ArchaeologyLithic Reduction Sequence Calculator
Classify a stone flake into reduction stages based on platform type, cortex, and dorsal scar attributes.
ArchaeologyArtifact Density Calculator
Calculate objects per cubic meter and per square meter from excavation unit dimensions and artifact counts.
MuseumArtifact Lighting Calculator
Calculate safe lux levels and annual light exposure limits for museum artifacts by material sensitivity class.
More in Science & Physics.