Skip to main content
Calcimator

Drought Management Calculator

Plan deficit irrigation strategy using FAO yield-response model to minimize yield and revenue loss when water supply is limited.

About this calculator

When water supply can't meet a crop's full-season demand, this calculator quantifies exactly how much yield you'll sacrifice and whether the water savings are worth it economically. It's built on the FAO Irrigation & Drainage Paper 33 yield-response equation published by Doorenbos and Kassam in 1979, (1 − Ya/Ym) = Ky × (1 − ETa/ETm): the fractional yield loss equals a crop-specific sensitivity factor (Ky) multiplied by the fractional water deficit. The engine first computes how much water your field actually needs for full-season evapotranspiration, compares that to your available supply (net of system efficiency losses), and derives a supply ratio and deficit fraction from the shortfall. That deficit is then run through the Ky factor to get expected yield reduction, which flows into projected yield, revenue, and a side-by-side net return under deficit versus full irrigation.

It also reports a marginal value of water — the revenue gained from one more acre-inch, derived directly from the Ky slope divided by full-season ET — which is the number that actually tells you whether buying more water is worth the cost. The key caveat: this uses a single, whole-season Ky rather than the more precise FAO approach of splitting yield sensitivity by growth stage (Ky is typically much higher during flowering and grain fill than during vegetative growth), so it assumes the deficit is spread evenly across the season. If you can time the shortfall to avoid the most sensitive growth stage, actual yield loss will likely be lower than this model predicts.

Inputs

ac
in
%

Results

Water supply ratio (%)

56.7

Yield reduction (%)

49.8

Full ET requirement (acre-in)2,400
ET deficit (%)43.3
Expected yield (bu/acre)100.3
Yield loss (bu/acre)99.7
Projected revenue ($)$55,183.00
Revenue loss ($)$54,817.00
Water cost ($)$5,600.00
Net return ($)$49,583.00
Water productivity (bu/acre-in)6.27
Water saved (acre-in)1,224
Marginal value of water ($/acre-in)$52.71
Net Return Full100,117.65

Figures current as of 1979. Source: Doorenbos J, Kassam AH. Yield Response to Water. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 33. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 1979.

How to Use This Calculator
  1. Enter Field size (acres), Full-season crop ET (in), and Available water (acre-in).
  2. Set Yield response factor (Ky), Max yield (bu/acre), and Crop price ($/bu).
  3. Adjust Water cost ($/acre-in), System efficiency (%) as needed.
  4. Review Water supply ratio (%) and Yield reduction (%).
  5. Use Full ET requirement (acre-in) and ET deficit (%) to inform your decision.

How the result changes with Field size (acres)

Field size (acres)Water supply ratio (%)Yield reduction (%)
501000
7575.628.1
15037.871.6
25022.788.9

What each input means

Field size (acres)
Total irrigated field area.
Full-season crop ET (in)
Total crop evapotranspiration for the full growing season.
Available water (acre-in)
Total water allocation for the season in acre-inches.
Yield response factor (Ky)
FAO yield response factor. Corn=1.25, wheat=1.05, soybean=0.85.
Max yield (bu/acre)
Expected yield under full irrigation.
Crop price ($/bu)
Expected market price per bushel.
Water cost ($/acre-in)
Cost per acre-inch of water applied (pumping + delivery).
System efficiency (%)
Irrigation application efficiency.

What each result means

Full ET requirement (acre-in)
Total water needed for full-season ET at field scale.
Water supply ratio (%)
Percentage of full ET requirement met by available supply.
ET deficit (%)
Fraction of ET not supplied.
Yield reduction (%)
Expected yield loss from water deficit using Ky factor.
Expected yield (bu/acre)
Projected yield under deficit irrigation.
Yield loss (bu/acre)
Bushels per acre lost compared to full irrigation.
Projected revenue ($)
Total crop revenue under deficit irrigation.
Revenue loss ($)
Revenue lost compared to full irrigation.
Water cost ($)
Total cost of water applied.
Net return ($)
Revenue minus water cost under deficit irrigation.
Water productivity (bu/acre-in)
Bushels produced per acre-inch of water applied.
Water saved (acre-in)
Water saved compared to full irrigation.
Marginal value of water ($/acre-in)
Revenue gain from one additional acre-inch of water.

How this is calculated

Worked example, using the default values

  1. Identify Input Parameters
    4 parameters
    Field size (acres) = 100, Full-season crop ET (in) = 24, Available water (acre-in) = 1600, Yield response factor (Ky) = 1.15 = 8 input(s) provided
  2. Calculate Water supply ratio
    Water supply ratio = min(1, netWaterAvailable / max(1, fullEtRequirement))
    56.7 = 56.7
  3. Calculate Yield reduction
    Yield reduction = min(1, yieldResponseKy * deficitFraction)
    49.8 = 49.8
  4. Calculate Full ET requirement
    Full ET requirement = fullSeasonEtIn * fieldAcres
    2400 = 2400
  5. Calculate ET deficit
    ET deficit = 1 - supplyRatio
    43.3 = 43.3

Figures and sources

Engine last updated . Checked against 1 independently-derived test — how we verify calculators. Built by Paul Gunder, a software engineer, not a licensed financial, medical, or legal professional.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does the Ky yield response factor actually represent?

Ky is the multiplier that translates a fractional water deficit into a fractional yield loss under the FAO equation (1 − Ya/Ym) = Ky × (1 − ETa/ETm), published by Doorenbos and Kassam in FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 33 (1979). A crop with Ky above 1 (like corn) loses yield faster than the deficit itself grows, while a crop with Ky below 1 (like soybean) is more forgiving of the same shortfall — the calculator multiplies your entered Ky directly by the computed deficit fraction to get expected yield reduction, so a higher Ky always produces a steeper yield loss for the same water shortage.

How is 'water saved' calculated, and does it account for the yield you give up?

Water saved is the gap between what full irrigation would require (full ET requirement adjusted for system efficiency) and what you actually supply — it's a pure volume comparison, not a value judgment. It doesn't net out the revenue lost to lower yield; that's why the calculator reports water saved and revenue loss as separate figures, and you have to weigh them against each other (or use the marginal value of water) to judge whether the deficit strategy pays off.

What is the 'marginal value of water' output, and how should I use it?

It estimates the revenue gained from one additional acre-inch of water, derived as the slope of the yield-response curve (max yield × Ky × crop price) divided by full-season ET. Compare it to your water cost per acre-inch: if the marginal value exceeds the cost, buying or applying more water is worth it economically; if it's lower, further irrigation isn't paying for itself at the margin.

Why might my actual yield loss differ from what this calculator predicts?

The model applies a single Ky value across the whole season, but real crop sensitivity to water stress varies sharply by growth stage — Ky is typically much higher during flowering and grain fill than during vegetative growth or early establishment. If you can time a limited water supply to protect the most sensitive stage, actual yield loss will likely be lower than this whole-season average predicts; if the deficit unavoidably hits a sensitive stage, it could be worse.

The questions that sit next to this one — chosen by subject, including calculators filed under a different category.

More in Agriculture & Farming.