Skip to main content
Calcimator

Tank Mix Compatibility Calculator

Compatibility score for multi-product mixes.

About this calculator

This calculator scores tank-mix compatibility the way a jar test does, but on paper instead of in a quart jar. It starts every mix at a perfect 100 and subtracts penalties for the conditions known to cause separation, curdling, or clumping in a spray tank. Loading more than three products costs 8 points per product beyond three (plus an extra 10 past five), because each additional formulation multiplies the chances of an incompatible pairing. The single biggest penalty, 25 points, hits when an emulsifiable concentrate (EC) is combined with a wettable powder (WP) or dry flowable (WDG) — the classic "EC breaks the powder's suspension" incompatibility every applicator learns to watch for.

Water chemistry matters too: hardness above 250 ppm CaCO3 chips away up to 20 points (with 10 more past 500 ppm) since calcium and magnesium ions can precipitate certain actives, extreme pH outside 5–8 costs 10 points per unit of deviation since many pesticides hydrolyze or degrade outside that window, and water colder than 50°F loses up to 15 points because powders and flowables dissolve poorly in cold water. The resulting 0–100 score sorts into three risk bands — 80+ is low risk, 50–79 warrants a physical jar test, and below 50 means don't mix without testing first. The calculator also recommends a water conditioner (like ammonium sulfate) once hardness passes 200 ppm, and scales a standard one-quart jar test's 946 mL proportionally across however many products you're checking. This score approximates what a physical jar test would show — it can't replace actually reading each product's label restrictions or running that jar test before mixing in the field.

Inputs

Results

Compatibility score

75

Risk level (1-3)2
Water conditioner needed0
Jar test mL/product473
Spray water pH7
Products in tank2
How to Use This Calculator
  1. Enter each product to be tank-mixed, including herbicides, insecticides, and adjuvants.
  2. Set the water pH and hardness level.
  3. Review the compatibility score and any incompatibility warnings.
  4. Follow the jar test procedure to physically verify compatibility before field mixing.
  5. Add products in the correct order: WP/WDG then liquids then EC then adjuvants.

What each input means

Number of products
Total products (pesticides, fertilizers, adjuvants) to mix.
Product 1 formulation
1=SP, 2=WP, 3=WDG, 4=SC/Flowable, 5=EC, 6=Solution, 7=Adjuvant.
Water hardness (ppm)
CaCO3 concentration in ppm. Check your water test report.
Water pH
Spray water pH. Ideal range is 5-7 for most pesticides.
Water temperature (F)
Cold water reduces solubility of powders and dry flowables.

What each result means

Compatibility score
0-100 score. 80+ = Low risk, 50-79 = Moderate, <50 = High risk.
Risk level (1-3)
1 = Low risk (proceed), 2 = Moderate (jar test recommended), 3 = High (do not mix without testing).
Water conditioner needed
1 = Yes (add ammonium sulfate or water conditioner), 0 = No.
Jar test mL/product
Proportional mL of each product for a standard 1-quart jar test.
Spray water pH
Entered water pH. Target 5-7 with a buffering agent if needed.
Products in tank
Number of products being tank mixed.

How this is calculated

Worked example, using the default values

  1. Identify Input Parameters
    4 parameters
    Number of products = 2, Product 1 formulation = 5, Product 2 formulation = 3, Water hardness (ppm) = 150 = 6 input(s) provided
  2. Calculate Compatibility score
    Compatibility score = 100
    75 = 75
  3. Calculate Risk level
    2 = 2
  4. Calculate Water conditioner needed
    Water conditioner needed
    0 = 0

Engine last updated . Checked against 1 independently-derived test — how we verify calculators. Built by Paul Gunder, a software engineer, not a licensed financial, medical, or legal professional.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why does adding more than three products to the tank lower the score even if each pair is compatible?

Every additional formulation multiplies the number of possible product-to-product interactions in the tank, not just the number of products, so the calculator subtracts 8 points for each product past three (and another 10 once you pass five) as a proxy for that growing combinatorial risk. Two products that are each fine on their own can still destabilize a third when all three are present, which a pairwise check alone wouldn't catch.

Why is mixing an emulsifiable concentrate (EC) with a wettable powder (WP) or WDG penalized so heavily?

EC formulations rely on emulsifiers to keep oil-based actives suspended in water, and the surfactants in a WP or WDG can strip that emulsion apart, causing the mix to separate, curdle, or clog nozzles — the single most common real-world tank-mix failure. That's why this pairing costs 25 points on its own, the largest individual penalty in the model.

What should I actually do differently between a Moderate and a High risk result?

A score of 50-79 (Moderate) means the calculator sees enough contributing factors — extra products, harder water, off-range pH, or cold water — that a physical jar test is strongly recommended before you commit a full tank. Below 50 (High) means don't load the sprayer at all until you've run that jar test and confirmed the mix holds up, since the penalties driving a score that low usually stack from more than one source at once.

Why does the calculator recommend a water conditioner once hardness passes 200 ppm?

Calcium and magnesium ions in hard water can bind to certain herbicide actives (glyphosate is the classic example) and precipitate them out of solution before they ever reach the plant, reducing efficacy independent of any mixing-order or emulsion problem. A water conditioner like ammonium sulfate ties up those ions first, which is why the flag appears at a lower hardness threshold (200 ppm) than the harder penalty band (250-500+ ppm) used in the score itself.

The questions that sit next to this one — chosen by subject, including calculators filed under a different category.

More in Agriculture & Farming.