Skip to main content
Calcimator

Rock Mass Rating (RMR) Calculator

Calculate the Bieniawski basic RMR89 classification from UCS, RQD, joint spacing, condition, and groundwater ratings (excludes the discontinuity-orientation adjustment).

About this calculator

The Bieniawski Rock Mass Rating (RMR) system is a widely used geotechnical classification for scoring how competent a rock mass is for tunneling, mining, and excavation design, first published by Z.T. Bieniawski and refined into the RMR89 version used here in his 1989 book Engineering Rock Mass Classifications (John Wiley & Sons). It combines five separately-scored parameters -- uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) of the intact rock, Rock Quality Designation (RQD, a measure of fracturing from drill core), joint spacing, joint condition, and groundwater condition -- into a single additive total (RMR = sum of all five sub-ratings). This is the BASIC RMR89 score; the complete Bieniawski system also subtracts a discontinuity-orientation adjustment (how favorably the joints are oriented relative to the excavation, ranging from 0 to -12 for tunnels, 0 to -25 for foundations, and 0 to -60 for slopes) that this calculator does not include, so treat the reported score as an upper bound on the final adjusted RMR.

Because the basic total is a simple sum with no interaction terms among the five scored parameters, every point earned on any one of them contributes exactly one point to the overall score, which is part of what makes RMR straightforward to apply consistently across different sites and engineers. Each sub-rating is selected from its own published band of discrete values rather than typed in freehand, since RMR's sub-ratings are themselves looked up from standard tables, not measured directly. The resulting score sorts the rock mass into one of five classes, from Class I ("Very Good Rock," RMR 81-100) down to Class V ("Very Poor Rock," RMR below 21), each with an associated qualitative guide to unsupported stand-up time, cohesion, and friction angle used for preliminary support design. RMR is a widely used starting point for excavation planning, but it is a classification tool based on field observations and engineering judgment in each sub-rating, not a substitute for detailed geotechnical analysis or site-specific engineering review before final support design.

Inputs

Results

Basic RMR (RMR₈₉)

60

Rock ClassIII
DescriptionFair Rock
Stand-Up Time1 wk for 5 m span
Cohesion Range200-300 kPa
Friction Angle25-35°

Figures current as of 1989. Source: Z.T. Bieniawski, Engineering Rock Mass Classifications (John Wiley & Sons, 1989)

How to Use This Calculator
  1. Select the Intact Rock Strength (UCS) band that matches your measured or estimated compressive strength.
  2. Select the Rock Quality Designation (RQD) band from drill core measurements.
  3. Select Discontinuity Spacing and Discontinuity Condition from field mapping observations.
  4. Select Groundwater Condition based on observed inflow or pore pressure.
  5. Review Basic RMR (RMR₈₉), Rock Class (I–V), and Stand-Up Time to design support and excavation sequences — note this basic score excludes the discontinuity-orientation adjustment.

What each input means

Intact Rock Strength (UCS)
Bieniawski RMR89 band for uniaxial compressive strength of the intact rock.
Rock Quality Designation (RQD)
Bieniawski RMR89 band for Rock Quality Designation from drill core.
Discontinuity Spacing
Bieniawski RMR89 band for spacing between rock discontinuities.
Discontinuity Condition
Bieniawski RMR89 band for roughness, continuity, and weathering of discontinuity surfaces.
Groundwater Condition
Bieniawski RMR89 band for observed groundwater inflow or pore pressure.

How this is calculated

Worked example, using the default values

  1. Identify Input Parameters
    4 parameters
    UCS Rating = 7, RQD Rating = 13, Joint Spacing Rating = 10, Joint Condition Rating = 20 = 5 input(s) provided
  2. Calculate RMR Score
    RMR Score
    60 = 60
  3. Calculate Rock Class
    Rock Class
    III = III
  4. Calculate Description
    Description
    Fair Rock = Fair Rock

Figures and sources

Engine last updated . Checked against 3 independently-derived tests — how we verify calculators. Built by Paul Gunder, a software engineer, not a licensed financial, medical, or legal professional.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which sub-rating carries the most weight in the overall RMR score?

Joint condition carries the most weight, contributing up to 30 of the 100 total points -- more than any other single parameter (RQD and joint spacing each cap at 20, groundwater at 15, and UCS strength at 15). That reflects how strongly the roughness, continuity, and weathering of discontinuity surfaces govern a rock mass's real-world stability, often more than the intact rock's own compressive strength.

What does a Class V rating (RMR below 21) actually mean for excavation planning?

Class V, "Very Poor Rock," indicates a rock mass with very low expected unsupported stand-up time (roughly 30 minutes for a 1-meter span in the Bieniawski guide table) and low cohesion and friction angle -- it signals that heavy, often immediate support is likely needed, and that the excavation design should lean conservative pending detailed site-specific geotechnical review.

Why are UCS, RQD, joint spacing, joint condition, and groundwater each rated separately?

Each parameter captures a different failure mechanism a rock mass can exhibit -- intact rock strength, how fractured the rock already is, how far apart those fractures sit, how rough or weathered the fracture surfaces are, and how much water pressure is acting on them. Scoring them independently and summing lets a single overall number reflect all five risk factors at once rather than any one dominating the classification.

Can the RMR score alone be used for final support design?

RMR is intended as a classification and preliminary planning tool -- the stand-up time, cohesion, and friction angle it reports are broad guideline ranges from the Bieniawski system's reference table, not site-specific engineering values. Final support design should incorporate detailed site investigation and engineering judgment beyond the RMR score alone.

The questions that sit next to this one — chosen by subject, including calculators filed under a different category.

More in Energy & Utilities.