Skip to main content
Calcimator

Part Cost Calculator

Calculate per-part injection molding cost from material, machine time, and amortized mold cost.

About this calculator

Every injection-molded part carries three genuinely independent cost components that this calculator adds together: material, the resin that actually becomes the part, priced per kilogram and inflated by your expected scrap rate to account for rejected parts and runner regrind that never becomes salable product; machine time, the press's fully-loaded hourly rate divided by how many parts it produces per hour, which itself depends on cycle time and how many cavities fire simultaneously each cycle; and mold amortization, the one-time tooling cost spread thinly across every part the mold is expected to produce over its entire working lifetime. Because these three cost streams are calculated completely independently, a change to any one input only moves its own line item — adjusting scrap rate never touches the machine or mold cost figures, and a longer expected mold lifetime lowers only the amortized tooling cost per part, leaving material and machine costs exactly where they were.

Parts-per-hour is the hinge between cycle time and every capacity figure this calculator reports: multiply it by cavity count to see how running more cavities per cycle directly multiplies throughput without shortening the cycle itself, and it feeds directly into both the machine cost per part and the parts-per-shift and annual-capacity figures used to sanity-check whether a given tooling and machine combination can actually deliver an order on time. High-volume programs typically see mold cost amortize down to a negligible fraction of total part cost, while low-volume or short-run programs can find tooling dominating the total, which is exactly the tradeoff that makes lifetime quantity such a consequential number to estimate accurately before committing to a mold design.

Inputs

oz
$/kg
sec
$/hr
%
$
parts

Results

Total Cost per Part

$0.29

Material Cost per Part$0.08
Machine Cost per Part$0.15
Mold Cost per Part$0.07
Parts per Hour576
Parts per 8-hr Shift4,608
Annual Capacity (24/7)3,456,000 parts
How to Use This Calculator
  1. Enter part weight (g) and material price per kg for your resin.
  2. Set cycle time (sec), press hourly machine rate ($), and number of cavities.
  3. Enter expected scrap rate (%) for your process.
  4. Review total cost per part broken down into material, machine, and mold amortization components.
  5. Use parts-per-hour output to validate production throughput against your order volume.

How the result changes with Number of Cavities

Number of CavitiesTotal Cost per Part
2$0.44
3$0.34
6$0.24
10$0.20

What each input means

Part Weight
Weight of a single finished part.
Material Price
Resin price per kilogram (e.g., PP: $1.50, ABS: $2.50, PC: $4.00).
Cycle Time
Total cycle time per shot.
Machine Rate
Fully loaded machine hourly rate (machine + operator + overhead).
Number of Cavities
Number of cavities producing parts per cycle.
Scrap Rate
Percentage of parts rejected plus runner regrind loss.
Mold Cost
Total mold tooling cost to amortize.
Lifetime Quantity
Total expected part quantity over the mold's lifetime.

How this is calculated

Worked example, using the default values

  1. Identify Input Parameters
    4 parameters
    Part Weight = 30, Material Price = 2.5, Cycle Time = 25, Machine Rate = 85 = 8 input(s) provided
  2. Calculate Total Cost per Part
    Total Cost per Part
    0.2891 = $0.289
  3. Calculate Material Cost per Part
    Material Cost per Part
    0.0765 = $0.077
  4. Calculate Machine Cost per Part
    Machine Cost per Part
    0.1476 = $0.148

Engine last updated . Checked against 2 independently-derived tests — how we verify calculators. Built by Paul Gunder, a software engineer, not a licensed financial, medical, or legal professional.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why does raising the scrap rate only affect material cost and not machine or mold cost?

Scrap rate specifically inflates the resin cost estimate to account for rejected parts and runner regrind that never becomes salable product, but it has no bearing on how fast the machine runs or how the fixed mold tooling cost gets amortized, since those two cost streams are calculated independently from material cost entirely. A process with a high scrap rate pays more per good part in raw material, but that penalty doesn't compound into the machine or mold cost figures shown here.

How does adding more cavities to the mold change per-part economics?

More cavities multiply parts-per-hour directly, since the same single cycle now produces multiple parts simultaneously rather than one, which spreads the fixed hourly machine rate across more parts and lowers machine cost per part substantially. It also raises annual capacity and parts-per-shift in direct proportion, though a multi-cavity mold typically costs meaningfully more to build in the first place, which is the real tradeoff worth weighing against the per-part machine savings.

Why does mold cost per part depend so heavily on lifetime quantity rather than just the mold's price tag?

A mold's total cost is a fixed, one-time expense regardless of how many parts it ultimately produces, so spreading that identical dollar amount across a much larger expected lifetime quantity dramatically shrinks the amortized cost attributed to any single part. This is exactly why tooling cost tends to dominate total part cost on a short production run and fade into a rounding error on a high-volume program running the same mold for millions of parts.

How should I use the parts-per-hour and annual capacity figures to check if I can meet an order deadline?

Parts-per-shift and annual capacity translate your cycle time and cavity count directly into a maximum realistic output rate, assuming the specific shift pattern and uptime this calculator assumes, so comparing that figure against your actual order quantity and deadline is a quick sanity check for whether the tooling and machine combination you're costing out can physically deliver in time. Real-world output also depends on machine uptime, changeovers, and quality issues this calculator doesn't model, so treat the capacity figures as a theoretical ceiling rather than a guaranteed delivery rate.

The questions that sit next to this one — chosen by subject, including calculators filed under a different category.

More in Manufacturing, Industrial & Coatings.