PERT Estimate Calculator
Calculate weighted duration from optimistic, most likely, and pessimistic estimates.
About this calculator
PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) three-point estimation replaces a single guess at a task's duration with three: an Optimistic (O) best case, a Most Likely (M) realistic case, and a Pessimistic (P) worst case. Originally developed in 1958 by the United States Navy Special Projects Office with Lockheed Aircraft and Booz Allen Hamilton to schedule the Polaris missile program, and now taught as PMI's standard three-point estimating technique, the classic PERT formula weights the most likely estimate four times as heavily as either extreme -- Expected Duration = (O + 4M + P) / 6 -- on the reasoning that most tasks cluster near their realistic estimate and the two extremes are less probable outcomes worth acknowledging but not centering the plan on. This calculator also derives a standard deviation, (P - O) / 6, which is a common approximation for the spread of a beta distribution fit to the three points, and uses it to build a confidence range around the expected duration and a risk factor (the coefficient of variation) that expresses how much uncertainty exists relative to the estimate itself.
A task with a wide gap between optimistic and pessimistic carries more schedule risk even if its expected duration matches a tighter, more certain task exactly. Like all three-point estimation, the technique is only as good as the three inputs -- it does not independently validate that the optimistic and pessimistic bounds are realistic, and it assumes the underlying uncertainty is reasonably well described by clustering around the most likely value rather than, say, a long tail of rare but severe delays. The model assumes the three inputs are ordered Optimistic ≤ Most Likely ≤ Pessimistic; entering them out of order (for example a pessimistic estimate lower than the optimistic one) produces a negative standard deviation and an inverted range that has no real-world meaning.
Inputs
Results
Expected Duration (PERT)
10.8 days
Figures current as of 1958. Source: United States Navy Special Projects Office, with Lockheed Aircraft Corporation and Booz Allen Hamilton, developed PERT for the Polaris submarine-missile program in 1958. Codified as the three-point estimating technique in PMI's A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide).
How to Use This Calculator
- Enter the optimistic (O), most likely (M), and pessimistic (P) duration estimates for the task.
- The calculator computes the PERT weighted average: (O + 4M + P) / 6.
- Review the PERT estimate and the standard deviation (P - O) / 6.
- Choose a Confidence Level (68%, 95%, or 99.7%) and read the Range (Low)-Range (High) band it produces.
- Sum PERT estimates across critical path tasks to get an overall project duration estimate.
How the result changes with Most Likely (M)
| Most Likely (M) | Expected Duration (PERT) |
|---|---|
| 5 | 7.5 days |
| 7.5 | 9.2 days |
| 15 | 14.2 days |
| 25 | 20.8 days |
What each input means
- Optimistic (O)
- Best-case scenario duration.
- Most Likely (M)
- Most probable duration.
- Pessimistic (P)
- Worst-case scenario duration.
- Confidence Level
- Number of standard deviations for the confidence interval.
How this is calculated
Worked example, using the default values
- Identify Input Parameters4 parametersOptimistic (O) = 5, Most Likely (M) = 10, Pessimistic (P) = 20, Confidence Level (1=68%, 2=95%, 3=99.7%) = 2 = 4 input(s) provided
- Calculate Expected Duration(O + 4M + P) / 6(5 + 4 × 10 + 20) / 6 = 10.8
- Calculate Standard DeviationStandard Deviation2.5 = 2.5
- Calculate VarianceVariance6.3 = 6.3
Figures and sources
- PERT three-point estimation formula: expected duration and standard deviation (1958) — United States Navy Special Projects Office, with Lockheed Aircraft Corporation and Booz Allen Hamilton, developed PERT for the Polaris submarine-missile program in 1958. Codified as the three-point estimating technique in PMI's A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide).
Engine last updated . Checked against 1 independently-derived test — how we verify calculators. Built by Paul Gunder, a software engineer, not a licensed financial, medical, or legal professional.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is the most likely estimate weighted four times as heavily as optimistic or pessimistic?
The classic PERT formula assumes task duration roughly follows a beta distribution where outcomes cluster around the realistic case and the two extremes are comparatively rare. Weighting Most Likely by 4 out of a denominator of 6 reflects that assumption -- it's the original weighting the U.S. Navy Special Projects Office adopted in 1958 when it developed PERT for the Polaris missile program, later standardized as PMI's three-point estimating technique, and it is the single input this calculator's expected duration responds to most strongly, since it carries four times the coefficient of either the optimistic or pessimistic estimate.
Does raising the confidence level change the expected duration?
No -- Expected Duration is calculated purely from the optimistic, most likely, and pessimistic inputs and does not reference the confidence level at all. Confidence Level only widens or narrows the range shown around that fixed expected duration; it never moves the duration figure itself.
How does narrowing the gap between optimistic and pessimistic affect the risk factor?
The risk factor is the standard deviation expressed as a percentage of the expected duration, and standard deviation is directly proportional to the gap between pessimistic and optimistic (P minus O, divided by 6). Narrowing that gap while holding the most likely estimate fixed lowers both the standard deviation and the risk factor, signaling a more predictable task.
Is a task with a longer expected duration automatically riskier than a shorter one?
Not necessarily -- risk here is measured by the spread between the best and worst case relative to the estimate, not by the estimate's absolute length. A long task with optimistic and pessimistic bounds close together can carry a lower risk factor than a short task whose outcome is genuinely uncertain and swings widely between best and worst case.
Related Calculators
The questions that sit next to this one — chosen by subject, including calculators filed under a different category.
Critical Path Calculator
Calculate critical path duration, ES, EF, LS, LF for project activities.
Project ManagementSprint Velocity Calculator
Calculate average story points with trend analysis.
GastroenterologyPancreatic Enzyme Dosing Calculator
Calculate pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT) lipase dosing by weight and fat intake. Includes capsule counts, safety limits, and monthly supply estimates.
Project ManagementAgile Team Capacity Calculator
Calculate sprint capacity accounting for ceremonies and focus factor.
More in Business & Entrepreneurship.