Skip to main content
Calcimator

Continuous Glucose Monitor Calculator

CGM data interpretation: time in range and GMI.

About this calculator

A continuous glucose monitor's 14-day report boils down to a handful of headline numbers, and this calculator reproduces the standard ones defined by the International Consensus on Time in Range, published by Battelino and colleagues in Diabetes Care in 2019 and endorsed by eight international diabetes associations. Time in Range (70-180 mg/dL) is the single most emphasized metric, with a target of 70% or more of readings falling in that band; Time Below Range (under 70 mg/dL) is tracked separately because hypoglycemia carries outsized clinical risk even at a low overall percentage, with a target under 4%. The consensus guidance also sets a stricter target for the more severe end of that range -- under 1% of readings below 54 mg/dL -- since even brief severe hypoglycemia carries outsized risk; this calculator's single Time Below Range input covers the whole under-70 band and does not separately collect a below-54 count, so check that sub-threshold against the raw CGM report rather than this calculator's output.

From mean glucose, the calculator derives two different A1c-style estimates: the Glucose Management Indicator (GMI), a lab-independent formula (3.31 + 0.02392 x mean glucose) introduced by Bergenstal and colleagues in a 2018 Diabetes Care paper that intentionally does not try to replicate a lab A1c's biology, and a separate ADAG-formula estimated A1c ((mean glucose + 46.7) / 28.7) based on a different published calibration study -- the two can and often do disagree by a few tenths of a percent for the same mean glucose, which is expected rather than an error. Glycemic variability is measured as the coefficient of variation (glucose standard deviation divided by mean, as a percentage), with 36% as the commonly cited cutoff between stable and unstable glucose patterns. Finally, an overall composite score combines Time in Range, a heavy penalty for time spent below range, and a bonus for low variability into a single 0-100 number meant to give a quick orientation, not to replace looking at the individual metrics that feed it.

Inputs

%
%

Results

GMI (%)

6.99

Estimated A1c (%)6.99
Coefficient of Variation (%)26
Time Above Range >180 (%)27
Variability Rating (0–2)0
CGM Score (0–100)65

Figures current as of 2019. Sources: Battelino T, Danne T, Bergenstal RM, et al. Clinical Targets for Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data Interpretation: Recommendations From the International Consensus on Time in Range. Diabetes Care. 2019;42(8):1593-1603., Bergenstal RM, Beck RW, Close KL, et al. Glucose Management Indicator (GMI): A New Term for Estimating A1C From Continuous Glucose Monitoring. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(11):2275-2280.

How to Use This Calculator
  1. Enter Mean Glucose (mg/dL) and Glucose Standard Deviation from the CGM report.
  2. Input Time in Range 70-180 % and Time Below Range < 70 %.
  3. The calculator derives GMI (Glucose Management Indicator) and Estimated A1c from your mean glucose.
  4. Review Time Above Range, Coefficient of Variation (CV), and Variability Rating.
  5. A CV below 36% and Time in Range above 70% indicate stable glucose management, summarized in the CGM Score.

How the result changes with Mean Glucose (mg/dL)

Mean Glucose (mg/dL)GMI (%)
775.15
1166.08
2318.84
38512.52

What each input means

Mean Glucose (mg/dL)
Average glucose reading from CGM over the reporting period (typically 14 days).
Glucose SD (mg/dL)
Standard deviation of glucose readings. Used to calculate coefficient of variation.
Time in Range 70–180 (%)
Percentage of time glucose is between 70–180 mg/dL. Target ≥70%.
Time Below Range <70 (%)
Percentage of time glucose is below 70 mg/dL. Target <4%.

What each result means

GMI (%)
Glucose Management Indicator — lab-independent A1c estimate: 3.31 + 0.02392 × mean glucose.
Estimated A1c (%)
Estimated HbA1c from mean glucose using ADAG formula: (mean + 46.7) / 28.7.
Coefficient of Variation (%)
Glycemic variability index. Target <36% for stable glucose. ≥36% = high variability.
Time Above Range >180 (%)
Percentage of time glucose is above 180 mg/dL. Target <25%.
Variability Rating (0–2)
0 = Stable (CV <36%), 1 = Moderate (36–50%), 2 = High variability (>50%).
CGM Score (0–100)
Composite score based on TIR, hypoglycemia penalty, and variability bonus. Higher is better.

How this is calculated

Worked example, using the default values

  1. Identify Input Parameters
    4 parameters
    Mean Glucose (mg/dL) = 154, Glucose SD (mg/dL) = 40, Time in Range 70–180 (%) = 70, Time Below Range <70 (%) = 3 = 4 input(s) provided
  2. Calculate GMI
    GMI = 3.31 + 0.02392 * meanGlucose
    6.99 = 6.99
  3. Calculate Estimated A1c
    Estimated A1c = (meanGlucose + 46.7) / 28.7
    6.99 = 6.99
  4. Calculate Coefficient of Variation
    26 = 26

Figures and sources

Engine last updated . Checked against 2 independently-derived tests — how we verify calculators. Built by Paul Gunder, a software engineer, not a licensed financial, medical, or legal professional.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why do GMI and estimated A1c give slightly different numbers from the same mean glucose?

Because they come from two different published formulas calibrated against two different studies -- GMI (3.31 + 0.02392 x mean glucose) and the ADAG-based estimated A1c ((mean glucose + 46.7) / 28.7) -- rather than one formula computed two ways. A difference of a few tenths of a percent between them at the same mean glucose is expected, not a sign either number is wrong.

What coefficient of variation counts as high glycemic variability?

This calculator uses 36% as the threshold: a coefficient of variation under 36% is read as stable glucose, 36-50% as moderate variability, and above 50% as high variability. The coefficient of variation is glucose standard deviation divided by mean glucose, so it measures relative swings around the average rather than the average level itself.

Does raising Time in Range or lowering Time Below Range help the overall CGM score more?

In this calculator's composite formula, Time in Range contributes directly on a 1-for-1 basis, while Time Below Range is penalized at five times that rate per percentage point -- each percentage point of time below range subtracts five points from the score. That per-point weighting is about rate, not typical impact: because Time Below Range values in a real CGM report are usually much smaller in absolute terms than Time in Range values, a realistic change in Time in Range usually moves the overall score more in practice, even though each individual point of Time Below Range counts for more.

Does mean glucose affect the overall CGM score directly?

Only indirectly, through the coefficient-of-variation bonus -- mean glucose does not appear in the score's Time in Range or Time Below Range terms at all. If mean glucose changes but the coefficient of variation stays on the same side of the 36% stability threshold, the overall score does not move, even though GMI and estimated A1c both would.

The questions that sit next to this one — chosen by subject, including calculators filed under a different category.

More in Medical & Clinical.