True Shooting Percentage Calculator
Calculate TS%, eFG%, and shooting efficiency from basketball box score stats.
About this calculator
True Shooting Percentage exists because standard field-goal percentage is a flawed efficiency metric — it ignores both the extra point a made three is worth and the free throws a player draws by getting to the line. This calculator computes True Shooting Attempts first (TSA = FGA + 0.44 × FTA), where the 0.44 coefficient is an empirical estimate of how many "possessions" a free throw attempt represents, since free throws often come in pairs or as part of and-one situations rather than one-for-one with field goal attempts. TS% is then points divided by twice the TSA, expressed as a percentage — dividing by 2×TSA rather than TSA alone because points already reflect makes worth 2 or 3, so this normalizes everything back to a per-shot-equivalent basis.
The calculator also reports Effective FG% (eFG% = (FGM + 0.5×3PM) / FGA), a narrower efficiency stat that credits made threes as worth 1.5 field goals but — unlike TS% — leaves free throws out entirely, useful for isolating field-goal shot selection from foul-drawing ability. Standard FG% and raw points-per-shot are included for context, and the calculator compares the computed TS% against a rough modern-NBA league-average benchmark of about 57.5%, reporting the gap directly as TS% vs League Avg — a positive number means above-average efficiency, a negative one means below. A common mixup: TS% and eFG% will diverge most for players who get to the free-throw line often, since eFG% has no way to reward that — a high-volume free-throw shooter can look mediocre on eFG% but strong on TS%.
Inputs
Results
True Shooting %
56.69%
How to Use This Calculator
- Enter total Points Scored and Field Goal Attempts (FGA) for the player.
- Add Free Throw Attempts (FTA) and Three-Pointers Made.
- Review True Shooting % (TS%) — the most comprehensive measure of shooting efficiency.
- Compare Effective FG% (eFG%) and standard FG% to understand the impact of free throws.
- Check TS% vs. League Avg to see how the player compares to the NBA average of ~57.5%.
How the result changes with Points Scored
| Points Scored | True Shooting % |
|---|---|
| 10 | 28.34% |
| 15 | 42.52% |
| 30 | 85.03% |
| 50 | 141.72% |
What each input means
- Points Scored
- Total points scored by the player.
- Field Goal Attempts (FGA)
- Total field goal attempts (2-point + 3-point).
- Field Goals Made (FGM)
- Total field goals made.
- Free Throw Attempts (FTA)
- Total free throw attempts.
- Three-Pointers Made
- Three-point field goals made (for eFG% calculation).
What each result means
- True Shooting %
- TS% = PTS / (2 × (FGA + 0.44 × FTA)). The gold standard of shooting efficiency.
- Effective FG%
- eFG% adjusts for the extra value of three-pointers.
- Field Goal %
- Standard FG% — field goals made divided by attempts.
- Points Per Shot
- Average points generated per field goal attempt.
- True Shooting Attempts
- TSA = FGA + 0.44 × FTA. Normalizes shot volume across free throws.
- TS% vs League Avg
- Difference from the ~57.5% NBA league average TS%.
How this is calculated
Worked example, using the default values
- Identify Input Parameters4 parametersPoints Scored = 20, Field Goal Attempts (FGA) = 15, Field Goals Made (FGM) = 7, Free Throw Attempts (FTA) = 6 = 5 input(s) provided
- Calculate True Shooting %56.69 = 56.69
- Calculate Effective FG%53.33 = 53.33
- Calculate Field Goal %46.67 = 46.67
Engine last updated . Built by Paul Gunder, a software engineer, not a licensed financial, medical, or legal professional.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why does the True Shooting formula divide by 2×TSA instead of TSA alone?
Points already reflect the different values of a made shot — 2 or 3 points per field goal, 1 per free throw — so dividing by True Shooting Attempts alone would overstate efficiency. Dividing by twice the TSA converts everything back to a common per-shot-equivalent basis, which is what makes TS% comparable across players with very different shot mixes.
What does the 0.44 coefficient in True Shooting Attempts actually represent?
It's an empirical estimate of how many 'possessions' a single free throw attempt is worth, since free throws typically come in pairs (two-shot fouls) or as part of and-one plays rather than one attempt per possession like a field goal. Multiplying FTA by 0.44 converts free throw attempts into an equivalent number of field-goal-attempt-like possessions before adding them to FGA.
How is Effective FG% different from True Shooting Percentage?
eFG% = (FGM + 0.5×3PM) / FGA credits made three-pointers as worth 1.5 field goals but completely excludes free throws from the calculation. TS% is broader — it folds in free throw attempts through the TSA term — so eFG% isolates pure field-goal shot selection and shot value, while TS% captures overall scoring efficiency including how well a player draws fouls.
Why might a player look mediocre on eFG% but strong on TS%?
Because eFG% has no mechanism to reward free throws at all, a player who draws a lot of fouls and shoots well from the line can post an unremarkable eFG% while still generating high scoring efficiency once free throws are counted. TS% captures that value because its TSA term explicitly folds in 0.44 × FTA, so the two stats diverge most for high-volume free-throw shooters.
Related Calculators
The questions that sit next to this one — chosen by subject, including calculators filed under a different category.
Basketball PER Calculator
Calculate a simplified Player Efficiency Rating (PER) from box score statistics. Measures overall per-minute productivity.
Team Sports & StatisticsLacrosse Shooting & Save Percentage Calculator
Calculate lacrosse shooting percentage, save percentage, and shot efficiency. Evaluate offensive and defensive performance.
Water PoloGame Analysis Score Calculator
Performance metrics from game statistics.
Sports AnalyticsExpected Points Added Calculator
Calculate EPA per play for football using down, distance, field position, and play outcome.
Sports AnalyticsWAR Calculator (Baseball) Calculator
Estimate Wins Above Replacement from batting, fielding, and baserunning stats.
More in Sports, Outdoors & Recreation.